The Science of Human Nature and the Social Contract

Authors

  • Peter Corning Institute for the Study of Complex Systems

Keywords:

Social justice, fairness, Plato, Sophists, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Rawls, basic needs, equity, reciprocity, naturalistic fallacy

Abstract

One of the most important political challenges of our time - indeed of all times - is social justice.  It was first addressed as a philosophical issue in Plato's great dialogue, the Republic, and it has been a continuing theme in the "tradition of discourse" ever since.  As I will argue, Plato's analysis and conclusions represent a sound foundation and a starting point for advancing a new social justice paradigm that is undergirded by the emerging, multi-disciplinary science of human nature, which is briefly overviewed here.  I refer to it as a "biosocial contract," and it involves three empirically-grounded fairness precepts - equality, equity, and reciprocity -- that together form a new normative framework for guiding social policy.  The obvious logical objection to such a normative undertaking, commonly referred to as the "naturalistic fallacy," is briefly considered from the perspective of the biological problem of survival and reproduction and the fundamental nature of a human society as, quintessentially, a "collective survival enterprise." Logic aside, the reality is that we are all required to make unavoidable choices.

Downloads

Published

18-08-2015

How to Cite

Corning, P. (2015). The Science of Human Nature and the Social Contract. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 11(1), 15–40. Retrieved from http://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/466

Issue

Section

Articles