Heidegger’s Spectral Abyss

Grounding the (Strange) Return of the Subject and Object in the Žižek & Harman Duel/Duet


  • Jan Gresil Kahambing University of Macau


Subject, Object, Substance, Ontology, Abyss, Spectrality


The split between the subject and object is the epistemological inheritance of modernity’s enchantment with substance, notably shown by the subjectivism in the Cartesian ‘cogito’ and Kantian ‘transcendental I’. In this paper, I will attempt to argue that despite Heidegger’s ontological hermeneutics that eclipsed Descartes’ dualism and Kant’s transcendentalism, there is still a possibility of the return of both Subject and Object – exemplified even on ontological grounds in Žižek’s Subject-Oriented Ontology and Harman’s Object-Oriented Ontology. Conveniently, I will situate the two ontologies, dubbed respectively as SOO and OOO, in the recent Žižek & Harman Duel/Duet (2017). Further, I will rework the uses of two important notions found only in this debate – unhintergebar (the ‘unsurpassable’) and ostranenie (defamiliarization)to explicate the transport from Heidegger’s metaphysical abyss to spectral abyss. Arguing from Heidegger’s ground (grund) and/or abyss (abgrund) that grounds possibilities of being, I will call this new ground for strange possibilities as spectral abyss (gespenstisch abrund). To achieve this, I will do two things. First, I will briefly rehearse the epistemological split and Heidegger’s ontological turn. And second, I will resituate the debate by showing how Žižek and Harman’s ontologies can emerge from Heidegger’s spectral abyss. My ultimate goal is then to explicate not the return but the ground that makes it possible for a strange return.  


Blanco, Maria, and Esther Peeren (eds.), The spectralities reader: Ghosts and haunting in contemporary cultural theory. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.

Bryant, Levi, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman, “Towards a Speculative Philosophy,” in The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, edited by Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek and Graham Harman. Australia: Re.Press, 2011.

Bryant, Levi. “Object-Oriented Ontology and Scientific Realism” in Larval Subjects (August 26, 2009), https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/object-oriented-ontology-and-scientific-naturalism/.

Caranti, Luigi. Kant and the Scandal of Philosophy. The Kantian Critique of Cartesian Scepticism. University of Toronto Press, 2007.

Cykowski, Beth. Heidegger’s Metaphysical Abyss: Between the Human and the Animal. Oxford University Press, 2021.

Derrida, Jacques. “Différance” in Margins of Philosophy trans. Alan Bass. Great Britain: The Harvester Press Limited, 1982.

Descartes, René. Discourse on the Method, trans. Ian Maclean. Oxford University Press, 2006.

Ferrando, Francesca. Philosophical Posthumanism. Great Britain: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.

Frede, Dorothea. “The question of being: Heidegger’s project,” in The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger ed. by C.B. Guignon (pp.42-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method, 2nd Edition. Continuum, 2004.

Gannon, Todd, Graham Harman, David Ruy, and Tom Wiscombe, “The Object Turn: A Conversation”, in Anyone 33 (2015), 73-94.

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. The Critique of Functionalist Reason vol. 2, trans. Thomas McCarthy. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

Harman, Graham. Guerilla Metaphysics. Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Illinois: Open Court, 2005.

Harman, Graham. Heidegger Explained. From Phenomenon to Thing. Open Court, 2007.

Harman, Graham. Immaterialism. Objects and Social Theory. UK: Polity Press, 2016.

Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. UK: Penguin Random House, 2017.

Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. UK: Zero Books, 2011.

Harman, Graham. Tool-Being. Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Illinois: Open Court, 2002.

Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art,” in Of the Beaten Track, trans. Julian Young and Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie & Robinson. Blackwell, 1962.

Heidegger, Martin. What is Called Thinking? Trans. J. Glen Gray. New York: Harper and Row, 1968.

Inwood, Michael. A Heidegger Dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1999.

Johnston, Adrian. Žižek’s Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist Theory of Subjectivity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2008.

Kadir, Çüçen. “Heidegger’s Reading of Descartes’ Dualism: The Relation of Subject and Object,” in Paideia, https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Cont/ContCuce.htm (Accessed March 3, 2022).

Kahambing, Jan Gresil. “Derrida and/to Žižek on the Spectral Victim of Human Rights in Anil’s Ghost,” in International Journal of Žižek Studies, vol. 13 no. 3, 2019, 1-18.

Kahambing, Jan Gresil. “The abyss, or the insufficiency of ethical nihilism for Nietzsche’s Übermensch,” in Ethics & Bioethics in Central Europe, vol. 10, nos. 3-4, 2020, 155-172.

Kahambing, Jan Gresil. “Without Sex: An Appraisal of Žižek’s Posthumanism,” in International Journal of Žižek Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, 2018, 1-18.

Kahambing, Jan Gresil. “Žižek’s Nietzsche and the Insufficiency of Trauma for a Posthuman Übermensch,” in The International Journal of Žižek Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021, 1-22.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason trans. Paul Guyer, ed. Allen Wood. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metephysics of Morals ed. Mary Gregor & Jens Timmermann, revised. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics trans. & ed. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge University Press.

Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1993.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books, 1968.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for everyone and no one trans. Hollingdale. New York: Penguin Books, 1969.

Palmer, Richard. Hermeneutics. Northwestern University Press, 1969.

Rice, Rebekah. Death and Persistence. Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Ricoeur, Paul. “The Task of Hermeneutics,” in Heidegger and Modern Philosophy. Critical Essays ed. Michael Murray (pp. 141-160). New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1978.

Ruy, David, “Returning to (Strange) Objects”, TARP Architecture Manual: Not Nature (2012), 38-42.

Shariatina, Zohreh. ‘Heideggers’ ideas about death,’ in Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2 (2016), 92-97.

Sloterdijk, Peter. “Rules of the Human Zoo: A Response to the Letter on Humanism,” in Environment and Planning, vol. 27 (2009), 12-28.

Strawson, Peter Frederick. Entity and Identity and Other Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

Tonner, Philip. Dwelling. Heidegger, Archaeology, Mortality. Routledge, 2018.

Žižek, Slavoj. “Nature and its Discontents,” in SubStance, vol. 37, no. 3, (2008), 37-72.

Žižek, Slavoj. Absolute Recoil: Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. Verso, 2014.

Žižek, Slavoj. Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism? London: Verso, 2001.

Žižek, Slavoj. Mapping the Ideology. New York: Verso, 1994.

Žižek, Slavoj. Sex and the Failed Absolute. Bloomsbury, 2019.

Žižek, Slavoj. Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Duke University Press, 1993.

Žižek, Slavoj. The Parallax View. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2006.




How to Cite

Kahambing, J. G. (2022). Heidegger’s Spectral Abyss: Grounding the (Strange) Return of the Subject and Object in the Žižek & Harman Duel/Duet. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 18(1), 302–330. Retrieved from https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1025