Mathematics, Narratives and Life

Reconciling Science and the Humanities

Authors

Keywords:

Mathematics, Narratives, Semiotics, Biosemiotics, Complexity theory, C.S. Peirce, A.N. Whitehead, F.W.J. Schelling

Abstract

The triumph of scientific materialism in the Seventeenth Century not only bifurcated nature into matter and mind and primary and secondary qualities, as Alfred North Whitehead pointed out in Science and the Modern World. It divided science and the humanities. The core of science is the effort to comprehend the cosmos through mathematics. The core of the humanities is the effort to comprehend history and human nature through narratives. The life sciences can be seen as the zone in which the conflict between these two very different ways of comprehending the world collide. Evolutionary theory as defended by Schelling developed out of natural history, but efforts have been made to formulate neo-Darwinism through mathematical models. However, it is impossible to eliminate stories from biology. As Stuart Kauffman argued, mathematical models attempt to pre-state all possibilities, but in evolution there can be adjacent possibles that can be embraced by organisms but cannot be pre-stated. To account for such actions it is necessary to tell stories. Mathematics provides analytic precision allowing long chains of deductions, but tends to deny temporal becoming and cannot do justice to the openness of the future, while narratives focus on processes and events, but lack exactitude that would provide precise deductions and predictions. In advancing mathematics adequate to life, Robert Rosen argued that living beings as anticipatory systems must have models of themselves, and strove to develop a form of mathematics able to model life itself. It has been convincingly argued that narratives are central to human self-creation and they are lived out before being explicitly told. Their models of themselves are first and foremost, stories or narratives. If this is the case, might not living beings as biological entities be characterized by proto-stories or narratives in their models of themselves? Biosemiotics, largely inspired by C.S. Peirce, provides a bridge between mathematical and narrative comprehension, conceiving them as different forms of semiosis. The study of life through biosemiotics could reveal how mathematics and narratives can be understood in relation to each other. This could have implications for how we understand science and the humanities and their relationship to each other. In this paper I will examine work in theoretical biology that might advance these efforts.

Author Biography

Arran Gare, Swinburne University

References

Allen, T.F.H. and Thomas B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Chicago: Uni. of Chicago Press.

Bohm, David and David F. Peat. 2000. Science, Order, and Creativity. 2nd ed. Toronto: Bantam Books.

Carr, David. 1991. Time, Narrative, and History. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Corning, Peter A., Stuart Kauffman, Denis Noble, James A. Shapiro, Richard I Vane-Wright, and Addy Pross. 2023. Evolution “On Purpose”: Teleonomy in Living Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Danesi, Marcel & Mariana Bockarova. 2014. Mathematics as a Modelling System: A Semiotic Approach. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.

Dupuy, J.P. 2009. On the origins of cognitive science: the mechanization of the mind. Tr. M. B. DeBevoise. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Davies, Paul. 2010. ‘Universe from bit’. From Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. Ed. Paul Davies & Niels Henrik Gregersen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Ch.5.

Eastman, Timothy E. 2020. Untying the Gordian Knot: Process, Reality, and Context. London: Lexington Books.

Gare, Arran. 2001. ‘Narratives and the Ethics and Politics of Environmentalism: The Transformative Power of Stories’, Theory & Science, 2 (1) Spring.

Gare, Arran. 2002a. ‘Process Philosophy and the Emergent Theory of Mind: Whitehead, Lloyd Morgan and Schelling’, Concrescence: The Australasian Journal for Process Thought: An Online Journal, Vol.3, pp.1-12.

Gare, Arran. 2002b. ‘Narratives and Culture: The Role of Stories in Self-Creation’, Telos, No.122, Winter: 80-101.

Gare, Arran. 2005 ‘Mathematics, Explanation and Reductionism: Exposing the Roots of the Egyptianism of European Civilization’, Cosmos & History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 1(1): 34-89.

Gare, Arran. 2011. ‘From Kant to Schelling to Process Metaphysics: On the Way to Ecological Civilization’, Cosmos & History, 7(2): 26-69.

Gare, Arran. 2013. ‘Overcoming the Newtonian paradigm: the unfinished project of theoretical biology from a Schellingian perspective’. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology. 113(1) Sept.: 5-24.

Gare, Arran. 2020. ‘Semiosis and Information: Meeting the Challenge of Information Science to Post-Reductionist Biosemiotics’, Biosemiotics, 13(3): 327-346.

Gare, Arran. 2022. ‘Life Processes as Proto-Narratives: Integrating Theoretical Biology and Biosemiotics Through Biohermeneutics’, Cosmos & History, 18(1): 210-251.

Goodwin, B.C. 1963. The Temporal Organization in Cells. London: Academic Press.

Grassmann, Hermann. 1995. A New Branch of Mathematics: the Ausdehnungslehere of 1844, and Other Works. Trans. Lloyd C. Kannenberg, Chicago: Open Court.

Grassmann, Hermann, 2000. Extension Theory [1862]. American Mathematical Society. Trans. Kannenberg, Lloyd C.

Ho, Mae-Wan. 2008. The Rainbow and the Worm: The Physics of Organisms, 3rd ed. New Jersey: World Scientific.

Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 1993. Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Trans. Barbara J. Haveland, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hoffmeyer, Jesper, ed. 2008. The Legacy of Living Systems: Gregory Bateson as Precursor to Living Systems. Dordrecht: Springer.

Jacob, Margaret C. 2003. The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans, [1981], 2nd ed. The Temple Publishers.

Kauffman, Stuart. 2000. ‘Emergence and Story: Beyond Newton, Einstein and Bohr?’ Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119-140.

Kauffman, Stuart. 2008. Reinventing the Sacred. New York: Basic Books.

Kauffman, Stuart and Arran Gare, 2015. ‘Beyond Descartes and Newton: Recovering life and humanity’, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119: 219-244.

Lakoff, George and Rafael E. Núňez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. N.Y.: Basic Books.

Lawvere, F. William. 1996. ‘Grassmann’s Dialectics and Category Theory’. In: Gert Schubring ed., Hermann Günther Grassmann (1809-1877): Visionary Mathematician, Scientist and Neohumanist Scholar. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 255-264.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1977. 'Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative and the Philosophy of Science'. Monist, 60: 453-472.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After Virtue, 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Markoš, Anton and Švorcova, Jana. 2021. Epigenetic Processes and the Evolution of Life. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2021.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1979. Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870’s, Ed. and trans, Daniel Breazeale, London: Humanities Press.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1898] 1968. Twilight of the Idols. Trans. R.J. Hollingdale, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Pattee, H.H. 1973. ‘The Physical Basis and Origin of Hierarchical Control’. In: Howard H. Pattee ed., Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, New York: George Braziller: 71-108.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. The Essential Peirce, Vol.2 (1893-1913). The Peirce Editions Project ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Rosen, Robert. 1991. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rosen, Robert. 2000. ‘The Church-Pythagoras Thesis’. In: Robert Rosen, Essays on Life Itself. New York: Columbia University Press, 63-81.

Rosen, Robert. 2012. Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

Salthe, Stanley N. 1993. Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Schelling, F.W.J. 2004. First Outline of a System of the Philosophy of Nature, [1799]. Trans. Keith R. Peterson. New York: State University of New York.

Toulmin, Stephen. 1994. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Waddington, C.H. 2010. ‘The Practical Consequences of Metaphysical Beliefs on a Biologist’s Work: an Autobiographical Note’. In: CH. Waddington ed. Sketching Theoretical Biology: Towards a Theoretical Biology Volume 2, 2nd ed. New Brunswick: Transaction, 72-81.

Whitehead, Alfred North. [1927] 1932. Science and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

26-07-2024

How to Cite

Gare, A. (2024). Mathematics, Narratives and Life: Reconciling Science and the Humanities. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 20(1), 133–155. Retrieved from https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1141