Epistemic Frameworks and Their Implications for Understanding the Rationality of Science
Keywords:
epistemic frameworks, naturalism, anti-naturalism, incommensurability, Weltanschauungen, rationality of science, presuppositionalismAbstract
This paper discusses the role epistemic frameworks play in science. First, the text explains what epistemic frameworks are and indicates that they are based on small sets of methodological decisions. Second, the paper shows that the different metaphysics underlying the various epistemic frameworks leads to diametrically opposed worldviews. Third, the paper investigates epistemic frameworks from the perspective of their incommensurability. In light of the discussed analysis, epistemic frameworks express the greatest possible difference in scientific views. The essay concludes that the approach presented here moves the discussion of the rationality of science from the traditional level − promoted by various schools of philosophy of science via analyses of rather extensive sets of methodological rules to the (meta)level of the two, or at most three, most basic methodological decisions.
References
Agassi Joseph, ‘Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Science’, Journal of the History of Ideas 1973, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 609-626.
Akins Kathleen (ed.), Perception, Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 1996.
Albert Leon H., ‘«Scientific» Creationism as a Pseudoscience’, Creation Evolution Journal 1986, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 25-34, https://tiny.pl/2gqt_dxd (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Alberts Bruce, ‘The Cell as a Collection Overview of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists’, Cell 1998, Vol. 92, pp. 291-295, https://tiny.pl/wwf68 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Allfree Mark, Davies Matthew, The Deception of Theistic Evolution, Bible Study Publications, Mansfield UK 2017.
Amsterdamski Stefan, Między doświadczeniem a metafizyką, Książka i Wiedza, Warszawa 1973.
Amsterdamski Stefan, Między historią a metodą, Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa 1983.
Arabatzis Theodore, ‘Can a Historian of Science Be a Scientific Realist?’, Philosophy of Science 2001, Vol. 68, No. 3, Supplement, pp. S531-S541.
Avise John C. and Ayala Francisco J. (eds.), In the Light of Evolution. Volume I: Adaptation and Complex Design, The National Academies Press, Washington DC 2007.
Ayala Francisco J., ‘Darwin’s Revolution’, in Campbell and Schoff (eds.), Creative Evolution…, !?, pp. 1-18.
Ayala Francisco J., ‘Darwin’s Greatest Discovery: Design without Designer’, in Avise and Ayala (eds.), In the Light of Evolution. Volume I…, pp. 3-21, https://tiny.pl/tx8s2 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Baergen Ralph, ‘The Influence of Cognition Upon Perception: The Empirical Story’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1993, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 13-23.
Bartlett Jonathan and Holloway Eric (eds.), Naturalism and Its Alternatives in Scientific Methodologies: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Alternatives to Methodological Naturalism, Blyth Institute Press, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 2017.
Bartlett Jonathan, ‘Philosophical Shortcomings of Methodological Naturalism and the Path Forward’, in Bartlett and Holloway (eds.), Naturalism and Its Alternatives…, pp. 13-37, https://tiny.pl/tr32k (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Baumgardner John R., ‘Catastrophic Plate Tectonics: The Physics Behind the Genesis Flood’, The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism 2003, Vol. 5, pp. 113-126, https://tiny.pl/wwdl8 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Behe Michael J., Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Free Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney 2006.
Brightman Edgar Sheffield, ‘An Empirical Approach to God’, The Philosophical Review 1937, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 147-169, https://tiny.pl/wwfgs (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Brunschvicg Leon, L'Expérience Humaine Et La Causalité Physique, Felix Alcan, Paris 1922, https://tiny.pl/wwftj (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Bylica Piotr, Kilian Krzysztof J., Piotrowski Robert, Sagan Dariusz (red.), Filozofia — nauka — religia. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Kazimierzowi Jodkowskiemu z okazji 40-lecia pracy naukowej, Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2015.
Bylica Piotr, ‘Główne założenia i problemy teizmu naturalistycznego w sprawie relacji sfery nadprzyrodzonej i świata przyrodniczego’, in Dyk (ed.), Sozologia systemowa…, pp. 55-95, https://tiny.pl/k_g9ky1x (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Bylica Piotr, Kilian Krzysztof J., Sagan Dariusz, ‘Wstęp’, in Bylica, Kilian, Piotrowski, Sagan (red.), Filozofia — nauka — religia…, pp. 11-33.
Campbell John H. and Schoff J.W. (eds.), Creative Evolution!?, Jones and Bartlett, New York 1994.
Chang Hasok, Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Springer, Cambridge 2012.
Chela-Flores Julian and Seckbach Joseph, ‘Divine Action and Evolution by Natural Selection. A Possible and Necessary Dialogue’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 1035-1048.
Cohen Robert S. and Laudan Larry (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht 1983.
Colodny Robert G. (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1965.
Coyne SJ George V., ‘Evolution and Intelligent Design. Who Needs God?’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 9-26.
Coyne Jerry A., Why Evolution is True, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York 2009.
CSSHS Editorial Staff, A Creation Course – In 13 Lessons, Creation Social Science and Humanities Society. Quarterly Journal 1990, Vol. 12, No. 1, https://tiny.pl/wwfkb (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
CSSHS Editorial Staff, ‘Lesson 1. Creation, the Foundation of the Biblical World View’, in CSSHS Editorial Staff, A Creation Course – In 13 Lessons…, pp. 2-7, https://tiny.pl/th318 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
CSSHS Editorial Staff, ‘Lesson 7. Man’s Creativity: Science’, in: CSSHS Editorial Staff, A Creation Course…, pp. 33-38, https://tiny.pl/th34w (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Darwin Charles, Autobiography of Charles Darwin with Two Appendices by His Son Francis Darwin, Rupa & Co., New Delhi 2003, https://tiny.pl/wwfgl (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Darwin Charles, The Origin of Species, P. Collier & Son, New York 1909, https://tiny.pl/wwfg9 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Dawkins Richard, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1976.
Dembski William A., ‘Intelligent Design: A Brief Introduction’, 4Truth.NetScience February 5, 2008, https://tiny.pl/tmkvf (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Devitt Michael, ‘Against Incommensurability’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1979, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 29-50.
De Vries Paul, ‘Naturalism in the Natural Sciences: A Christian Perspective’, Christian Scholar’s Review, Summer 1986, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 388-396.
DeWolf David K., Meyer Stephen C., DeForrest Mark Edward, ‘Teaching the Origins Controversy: Science, or Religion, or Speech?’, Utah Law Review 2000, Vol. 39, pp. 39-110, https://tiny.pl/tgqg4 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Dyk Wiesław (ed.), Sozologia systemowa. Vol. IV. Biosfera. Człowiek i jego środowisko w aspekcie przyrodniczym, filozoficznym i teologicznym, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin 2012.
Engels Frederick, Dialectics of Nature, transl. and ed. by Clemens Dutt, International Publishers, New York 1940, https://tiny.pl/wwdk3 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Feigl Herbert, Feyerabend Paul K., Hanson Norwood R., Hempel Carl G., Hesse Mary, Maxwell Grover and Rozeboom William, ‘Discussion at the Conference on Correspondence Rules’, in Radner and Winokur (eds.), Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology…, pp. 220-259.
Feigl Herbert, Maxwell Grover (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1962.
Feyerabend Paul K., Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, New Left Books, London 1975.
Feyerabend Paul K., Against Method. Third Edition, Verso, London 1993.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘An Attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1…, pp. 17-36.
Feyerabend Paul. K., ‘Changing Patterns of Reconstruction’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1977, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 351-369.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Consolations for the Specialist’, in: Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2…, pp. 131-167.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism’, in Feigl, Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation…, pp. 28-97.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Introduction to the Volumes 1 and 2’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1…, pp. ix-xiv.
Feyerabend Paul K., Killing Time, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 1995.
Feyerabend K. Paul, ‘The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2…, pp. 202-230.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘More Clothes from the Emperor’s Bargain Basement: A Review of Laudan’s Progress and its Problems’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2…, pp. 231- 246.
Feyerabend Paul K., Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1. Realism, Rationalism & Scientific Method, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York – Port Chester – Melbourne – Sydney 1981.
Feyerabend Paul K., Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. Problems of Empiricism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York–Port–Chester–Melbourne–Sydney 1981.
Feyerabend Paul K., Philosophical Papers. Vol. 4. Physics and Philosophy, Stefano Gattei and Joseph Agassi (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York 2016.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Physics and Ontology’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 4…, 9-24
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Problems of Empiricism’, in Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty…, pp. 145-260.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Reply to Criticism. Comments on Smart, Sellars and Putnam’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1…, pp. 104-131.
Feyerabend Paul K., Science in a Free Society, Verso, London 1983.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘«Science». The Myth and Its Role in Society’, Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 1975, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 167-181.
Feyerabend Paul K., Three Dialogues on Knowledge, Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford UK & Cambridge USA 1991.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Third Dialogue’, in: Feyerabend, Three Dialogues on Knowledge…, pp. 125-160.
Fitzhugh Kirk, ‘Evidence for Evolution Versus Evidence for Intelligent Design: Parallel Confusions’, BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, Vol. 37, pp 68-92.
Forrest Barbara Carroll, ‘Inside Creationism’s Trojan Horse: A Closer Look at Intelligent Design’, Georgia Journal of Science 2005, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 153-166.
Futuyma Douglas J., Miracles and Molecules, Boston Review, February/March 1997, pp. 29-30.
Gish Duane, Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record, Creation-Life Publishers, El Cajon 1985.
Godfrey-Smith Peter, Theory and Reality. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 2003.
Gotfryd Arnie, ‘Evolution: Myths and Facts’, in: Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 1023-1031.
Gould Stephen Jay, ‘Evolution as Fact and Theory’, in Gould, Hen’s Teeth… pp. 253-262.
Gould Stephen Jay, Hen’s Teeth and Horse’s Toes, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London 1983.
Gould Stephen Jay, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, W.W. Norton & Company, New York‒London 1990.
Gordon Bruce L. and Dembski William A. (eds.), The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science, ISI Books, Wilmington, Delaware 2011.
Grimes John, ‘On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Saccades’, in Akins (ed.), Perception…, pp. 89-110.
Haldane John B.S., Facts and Faith, Watts & Co., London 1936, https://tiny.pl/wwfk7 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Heller Michał, ‘Chrześcijański naturalizm’, Roczniki Filozoficzne 2003, Vol. 51, No 3, p. 47 [41-58], https://tiny.pl/tq2q2 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Heller Michael [Michał], The New Physics and a New Theology, transl. by G.V. Coyne, S.J.S. Giovannini, T.M. Sierotowicz, Vatican Observatory Publications, Vatican 1996.
Herschel John F.W., Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans, London 1851, https://tiny.pl/tr3vw (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Hess Peter M. J., ‘How Do I Read the Bible? Let Me Count the Ways’, National Center for Science Education January 22nd, 2016, https://tiny.pl/k-gdhgn8 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Holloway Eric, ‘Problems With Non-Naturalistic Theories of Science’, in Bartlett and Holloway (eds.), Naturalism and Its Alternatives…, pp. 163-176.
Johnson Phillip E., Wielka metafizyczna opowieść nauki (z posłowiem Kazimierza Jodkowskiego), Archiwum Na Początku..., Vol. 13, Polskie Towarzystwo Kreacjonistyczne, Warsaw 2003.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Antynaturalizm teorii inteligentnego projektu’, Roczniki Filozoficzne 2006, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 63-76, https://tiny.pl/tdzjz (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Darwinowska teoria ewolucji jako teoria filozoficzna’, in: Konstańczak, Turowski (eds.), Filozofia jako mądrość bycia…, pp. 17-23, https://tiny.pl/w6q1hgdt (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Demistyfikacja sporu kreacjonizm-ewolucjonizm’, Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria 1999, R. 8, Nr 3 (31), pp. 77-94, https://tiny.pl/03qvpcpw (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Dlaczego kreacjonizm jest pseudonauką?’, in Zon (ed.), Pogranicza nauki…, pp. 317-323.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Filozofia nauki Paula K. Feyerabenda. Stadium umiarkowane’, Studia Filozoficzne 1979, Nr 11, pp. 59-75.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Filozofia przyrody a nauki przyrodnicze’, Colloquia Communia 2007, Nos. 1-2 (82-83), pp. 15-22, https://tiny.pl/tlkgz (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Epistemiczne układy odniesienia i «warunek Jodkowskiego»’, in Latawiec and Bugajak (eds.), Filozoficzne i naukowo-przyrodnicze elementy obrazu świata…, pp. 108-123.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Eskapizm teologii i filozofii katolickiej w sprawie «nauka a religia»’, Na Początku… 2005, Nos. 7-8 (196-197), pp. 261-284, https://tiny.pl/xgdgh3yt (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Klasyfikacja stanowisk kreacjonistycznych’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2005/2006, Vol. 2/3, pp. 241-269, https://tiny.pl/yx_47xxt (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Kreacjoniści przed sądem. Aspekty filozoficzne «małpich procesów»’, in Michalczenia, Mizińska, Ossowska (eds.), Poszukiwania filozoficzne. Tom I…, pp. 175-198.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Metafizyczne opowieści nauki jako fundament pluralizmu naukowego’, in Johnson, Wielka metafizyczna opowieść nauki…, pp. 74-85.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, Metodologiczne aspekty kontrowersji ewolucjonizm-kreacjonizm, Realizm. Racjonalność. Relatywizm, Vol. 35, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej, Lublin 1998.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Nienaukowy fundament nauki’, in Pietrzak (ed.), Granice nauki…, pp. 59-108, https://tiny.pl/n-36qskz (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Racjonalność Kopernika i Darwina. Polemika z drem Eugeniuszem Moczydłowskim’, Na Początku… 2003, No. 11-12A (174-175), pp. 433-448, https://tiny.pl/kr7h307z (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, Teza o niewspółmierności w ujęciu Thomasa S. Kuhna i Paula K. Feyerabenda, Realizm. Racjonalność. Relatywizm, Vol. 1, Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin 1984, https://tiny.pl/tlk98 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Johnson Phillip E., ‘Evolution as Dogma: The Establishment of Naturalism’, First Things October 1990, https://tiny.pl/thtm9 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Johnson Phillip E., ‘Shouting «Heresy» in the Temple of Darwin’, Christianity Today 1994, October 24, Vol. 38, No. 12, pp. 22-26, https://tiny.pl/tnnxyjc9 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Keller Tim, ‘Creation, Evolution, and Christian Laypeople’, BioLogos February 23rd, 2012, pp. 1-14, https://tiny.pl/wwfkj (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Arguments Against Methodological Naturalism and Their Roots in Metaphysics’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 2024, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 268-313, https://tiny.pl/bb6cnnm9 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Arguments for Methodological Naturalism and Their Roots in a Particular Metaphysics’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 2023, Vol. 19, No 1, pp. 113-157, https://tiny.pl/c32z4 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Czym są epistemiczne układy odniesienia?’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2017, Vol. 14, pp. 191-235, https://tiny.pl/g86dn (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Epistemiczne układy odniesienia a problem interteoretycznej niewspółmierności—część 1’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2017, Vol. 14, pp. 237-280, https://tiny.pl/wwf48 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Epistemiczne układy odniesienia a problem interteoretycznej niewspółmierności—część 2’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2017, Vol. 14, pp. 281-325; https://tiny.pl/wwf46 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Epistemiczne układy odniesienia – nowe spojrzenie na racjonalność naukową’, Sofia. Pismo Filozofów Krajów Słowiańskich 2018, Vol. 18, pp. 45-54 [37-58], https://tiny.pl/tl4mn (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Geneza idei epistemicznych układów odniesienia i ich odmiany’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2017, Vol. 14, pp. 137-190, https://tiny.pl/wwd2w (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Światopoglądowy i ideologiczny wymiar epistemicznych układów odniesienia a teistyczno-naturalistyczny epistemiczny układ odniesienia’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2018, Vol. 15, pp. 139-222, https://tiny.pl/w4chg (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘What is Epistemological Anarchism?’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2023, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 203-233, https://tiny.pl/9bbtw8qm (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., Współczesne epistemiczne układy odniesienia w nauce, Biblioteka Filozoficznych Aspektów Genezy, Vol. 9, Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2021.
Kitcher Phillip, ‘Born-again Creationism’, in Pennock (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism…, pp. 257-288.
Konstańczak Stefan, Turowski Tomasz (eds.), Filozofia jako mądrość bycia, Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2009.
Kotowicz Wojciech, ‘Józefa Życińskiego meta-przedmiotowe ujęcie relacji między nauką a religią’, Roczniki Filozoficzne 2012, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 249-260, https://tiny.pl/tqfh3 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Krausz Michael (ed.), Is There a Single Right Interpretation?, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 2002.
Kenyon Dean H., ‘The Creationist View of Biologic Origin’, Nexa Journal Spring 1984, pp. 28-35.
Klinghoffer David (ed.), Debating Darwin’s Doubt. A Scientific Controversy That Can No Longer Be Denied, Discovery Institute Press, Seattle 2015.
Kojonen Erkki Vesa Rope, Intelligent Design: A Theological and Philosophical Analysis, University of Helsinki Press, Helsinki 2014.
Kowalski-Glikman Jerzy, ‘Bezradność postępowego inteligenta’, Świat Nauki 2008, No 2 (198), pp. 84-85.
Korthof Gert, ‘Common Descent: It’s All or Nothing’, in Young and Edis (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails…, pp. 32-47.
Korthof Gert, “Who Created the First Tree of Life? Comparing Trees of Hitchcock, Darwin and Haeckel”, Towards the Third Evolutionary Synthesis 12th February 2017, https://tiny.pl/tm1m7 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Kuhn Thomas S., ‘Reflections on My Critics’, in: Kuhn, The Road since Structure…, pp. 123-175.
Kuhn Thomas S., ‘Theory Change as Structure Change: Comments on the Sneed Formalism’, in Kuhn, The Road since Structure…, pp. 176-195.
Kuhn Thomas S., The Road since Structure, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 2000.
Kuhn Thomas S., ‘The Road since Structure’, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990, Vol. 2, pp. 3-13.
Kuhn Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1970.
Lakatos Imre and Musgrave Alan (eds.), Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1970.
Laplane Lucie, Mantovani Paolo, Adolphs Ralph, Chang Hasok, Mantovani Alberto, McFall-Ngai Margaret, Rovelli Carlo, Sober Elliott and Pradeu Thomas, ‘Why Science Needs Philosophy’, PNAS March 5, 2019, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 3948-3952, https://tiny.pl/wwd2t (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Larmer Robert A., ‘Is Methodological Naturalism Question-Begging?’, Philosophia Christi 2003, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 117-118, 130 [113-130], https://tiny.pl/g2sgc (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Latawiec Anna and Bugajak Grzegorz (eds.), Filozoficzne i naukowo-przyrodnicze elementy obrazu świata 7, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, Warsaw 2008.
Laudan Larry, ‘The Demise of the Demarcation Problem’, in Cohen and Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis…, pp. 111-127.
Lewens Tim, ‘Realism and the Strong Program’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2005, Vol. 56, pp. 559-577.
Lipton Peter, ‘Inference to the Best Explanation’, in Newton-Smith, A Companion to the Philosophy of Science…, pp. 184-193.
Luciano Michael S., ‘Why Intelligent Design Doesn’t Cut It: A Primer’, Talk Reason June 30, 2009, https://tiny.pl/tt7fv (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Luskin Casey, ‘Mistaking Intelligent Design for a God-of-the-Gaps Argument’, in Klinghoffer (ed.), Debating Darwin’s Doubt…, pp. 295-304.
Łomnicki Adam, ‘Czy darwinowska teoria ewolucji jest dogmatem współczesnej biologii, czy zmową elit?’, Wszechświat 2014, Vol. 115, Nos. 1-3, pp. 56-60, http://tiny.pl/gkb4q (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Oakes Edward T., ‘The Enigma of Final Causality. Biological Causality in Aristotle and Neo-Darwinism’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 31-44.
Oldroyd David R., Darwinian Impacts: An Introduction to the Darwinian Revolution, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey 1980.
Malec Grzegorz, ‘Teologiczne dylematy Karola Darwina’, Roczniki Filozoficzne 2012, Vol. 60, No 1, pp. 67-85, http://tiny.pl/g4751 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Marsh Lewis, ‘Fundamental Biology’, in Numbers (ed.), Creationism in Twentieth-Century America…, pp. 395-530.
Maynard Smith John, The Theory of Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK 2000.
Mayr Ernst, What Evolution Is, Phoenix, London 2002.
McMullin Ernan, Evolution versus Creation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 1985.
McMullin Ernan, ‘Introduction: Evolution versus Creation’, in McMullin (ed.), Evolution versus Creation…, pp. 1-58.
McMullin Ernan, ‘Varieties of Methodological Naturalism’, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. 82-92.
Mele Alfred R., Rawling Piers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York 2004.
Meyer Stephen C., ‘Scientific Tenets of Faith’, Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation 1986, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 40-42, https://tiny.pl/wwfqv (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Meyer Stephen C., Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, Harper One, New York 2009.
Meyer Stephen C., ‘No New Genetic Information Needed?’ in Klinghoffer (ed.), Debating Darwin’s Doubt…, pp. 133-141.
Michalczenia Jakub, Mizińska Jadwiga, Ossowska Katarzyna (eds.), Poszukiwania filozoficzne. Tom I: Nauka, Prawda. Panu Profesorowi Józefowi Dębowskiemu w darze, Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie, Olsztyn 2014.
Mignea Arminius, ‘Methodological Naturalism and Its Creation Story’, in Bartlett and Holloway (eds.), Naturalism and Its..., pp. 129-162.
Miller Keith B., ‘Countering Public Misconceptions about the Nature of Evolutionary Science’, Georgia Journal of Science 2005, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 175-189, https://tiny.pl/tqw12 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Mohanty Jitendranath, ‘Intentionality, Meaning, and Open-Endedness of Interpretation’, in Krausz (ed.), Is There a Single Right Interpretation…, pp. 63-75.
Moreland J.P., Scientism and Secularism: Learning to Respond to a Dangerous Ideology, Crossway, Wheaton Ill. 2018.
Morris Henry M., Morris John D., Science, Scripture, and the Young Earth, Master Books, El Cajon, CA 1989.
Morris Henry M., Scientific Creationism, Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego 1974.
Morris Henry M., The Biblical Basis for Modern Science, Baker Books, Grand Rapids, MI 1984.
Munévar Gonzalo, A Theory of Wonder: Evolution, Brain and the Radical Nature of Science, Vernon Press, Wilmington, Malaga 2021.
Nagel Thomas, ‘Public Education and Intelligent Design’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 2008, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 187-205.
Newton-Smith W.H., A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, Blackwell Publishers, Malden MA, Oxford UK 2000.
Numbers Ronald N. (ed.), Creationism in Twentieth-Century America. A Ten Volume Anthology of Documents, 1903-1961, Vol. 8. The Early Writings of Harold W. Clark, and Frank Lewis Marsh, Garland Publishing Inc., New York & London 1995.
O’Connor Robert C., ‘Science on Trial: Exploring the Rationality of Methodological Naturalism’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 1997, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 15-31, https://tiny.pl/wwf95 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Pearcey Nancy, ‘Evolution After Darwin – What’s Left?’, Bible−Science Newsletter August 1985, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 7-10.
Pennock Robert T. (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2001.
Pietrzak Zbigniew (ed.), Granice nauki, Lectiones & Acroases Philosophicae 2013, Vol. VI, No. 1.
Pine Ronald H., ‘But Some of Them Are Scientists, Aren’t They?’, Creation/Evolution Journal 1984, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp 6-18, https://tiny.pl/j_thbm4f (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Plantinga Alvin, ‘When Faith and Reason Clash: Evolution and the Bible’, Christian Scholar’s Review 1991, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 8-33, https://tiny.pl/gzln9 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Plato, The Republic, transl. by Tom Griffith, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK 2018.
Poincaré Henri, Science and Hypothesis, The Walter Scott Publishing Co, New York 1905.
Poincaré Henri, Science and Method, Thomas Nelson and Sons, London, Edinburgh, Dublin and New York 1914.
Popper Karl R., ‘Normal Science and its Dangers’, in: Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge…, pp. 51-59.
Popper Karl R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York 2002.
Radner Michael and Winokur Stephen (eds.), Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1970, Vol. 4.
Ratzsch Del, Nature, Design and Science. The Status of Design in Natural Science, State University of New York Press, Albany 2001.
Robinson James T., ‘Incommensurability of Evolution and Special Creation’, The American Biology Teacher 1971, Vol. 33, No. 9, pp. 535-538 and p. 545.
Rudwick Martin J.S., ‘Charles Lyell Speaks in the Lecture Theatre’, The British Journal for the History of Science 1976, Vol. 9, No. 2, Lyell Centenary Issue: Papers Delivered at the Charles Lyell Centenary Symposium, London 1975, pp. 147-155.
Michael Ruse, ‘Creationism’, in Zalta and Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy…, https://tiny.pl/t9r44 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024)
Ruse Michael, Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose?, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, London 2003.
Ruse Michael, ‘Evolution and Ethics’, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. 855-864.
Ruse Michael, ‘Saving Darwinism from the Darwinians’, National Post, Saturday 13th May, 2000, pp. B1, B3, B7.
Sagan Dariusz, ‘Kazimierz Jodkowski o teorii inteligentnego projektu’, in Bylica, Kilian, Piotrowski i Sagan (red.), Filozofia — nauka — religia…, pp. 213-227.
Seckbach Joseph, Gordon Richard (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection. Science, Faith and Evolution, World Scientific, New Jersey, London, Singapore, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Tai Pei, Chennai, 2009.
Shapiro James A., Evolution. A View from the 21st Century. Fortified. Why Evolution Works as Well as It Does, Cognition Press, Chicago 2022.
Shute Evan, Flaws in the Theory of Evolution, Tameside Press, London 1961.
Snoke David W., ‘Defining Undesign in a Designed Universe’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, December 2008, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 225-232, https://tiny.pl/wwf8q (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Lee M. Spetner, ‘The Evolution Controversy and Randomness’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 815-830.
Thagard Paul, ‘Rationality and Science’, in Mele, Rawling (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality…, pp. 363-379.
Thaxton Charles, ‘A New Design Argument’, Discovery.org September 1, 1994, https://tiny.pl/wwf9d (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Thompson Bert, Creation Compromises, Apologetics Press Inc., Montgomery AL 2000, https://tiny.pl/wwf6n (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Van Till Howard J., ‘Cosmic Evolution, Naturalism, and Divine Creativity, or Who Owns the Robust Formational Economy Principle?, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. 535-546.
Wagner Michał Jakub, ‘The Liminal Nature of the »Eclipse of Darwinism« as a Critical Phase in the History of Evolutionary Biology’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2022, Vol. 19, Nr 2, pp. 141-162, https://tiny.pl/wzrn7 (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Walczak Monika, Racjonalność nauki. Problemy, koncepcje argumenty, Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, Lublin 2006.
Walton John H., The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove Ill. 2009.
Wilson Edward O., On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., London 1978.
Wiśniewski Andrzej, ‘Dlaczego należy czytać Jodkowskiego?’, in Bylica, Kilian, Piotrowski, Sagan (eds.), Filozofia — nauka — religia…, pp. 37-41.
Wood Todd Charles, Wise Kurt P., Sanders Roger, Doran N., ‘A Refined Baramin Concept’, Occasional Papers of the Baraminology Study Group 2003, No. 3, pp. 1-14, https://tiny.pl/wwd4s (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Yahya Harun, ‘Did Life on Earth Begin Suddenly and in Complex Forms?’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 299-319.
Young Matt and Edis Taner (eds.), Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick 2006.
Zalta Edward N. and Nodelman Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://tiny.pl/t9r4n (accessed Oct. 10, 2024).
Zon Józef (ed.), Pogranicza nauki. Protonauka — paranauka — pseudonauka, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2009.
Zybertowicz Andrzej et al., Samobójstwo Oświecenia?, Wydawnictwo Kasper, Krakow 2015.
Życiński Józef, Bóg i ewolucja. Podstawowe pytania ewolucjonizmu chrześcijańskiego, Prace Wydziału Filozoficznego, Vol. 89, Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, Lublin 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Krzysztof Kilian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
