The Principle of Art (in Practice)
Keywords:
Normative Aesthetics, General Aesthetics, Ethical PhenomenologyAbstract
This paper disputes the generalised definition of ‘aesthetic practice’ which leads deconstructive postmodern ‘aestheticians’ to equate aesthetic activities (eg., gardening, hair-braiding) with art-making. Reviving an understanding of Art’s single unifying Principle is a necessary precondition for restoring the meaning of an artistic practice. I describe its ancient origins, its disappearance in modernity, and reconstruct its defining criteria, showing why art cannot be confused with just any ‘cultural practice’ whereby one’s experience of the ‘general aesthetic’ can by merely mimicking Nature elicit familiar empathic responses reflectively. I argue very little real art is being made today, and AI is perfectly suited to making what has replaced it: ‘cultural artefact’. In reconstructing this Principle, I show why artistic practice cannot be predicated merely upon theories of beauty/pleasure; but rather on what Aristotle deemed the ‘higher pleasure’ of making Reason (merging beauty with truth, and freedom with necessity). This overcomes Kant’s reflective aesthetic paradigm that engendered the misguided ‘experientialism’ dominating modern/postmodern “art” - undergirding an ‘artworld’ of mainly anti-Art (in what Bernard Stiegler calls the ‘catastrophe’ of modern aesthetic experience driven by the rise of ‘technicism’). A process for applying the Principle’s criteria is briefly outlined, demonstrating how to distinguish a ‘phenomenological experience’ from ‘ordinary experience’, and thus a genuinely poetic discourse from any other form of speculative discourse. Uncovering the Principle’s origins in Aristotle’s natural science (and his discernment of ‘making’ from ‘acting’ in technê), separating normative from theoretical aesthetics, and unveiling art’s ‘objective’ meaningfulness in any artwork’s phenomenology, reaffirms why art’s relation to the Person (its ‘anthropological phenomenology’) is of primary concern to aesthetes. I conclude with how the purpose of all inquiry into aesthetics is made more meaningful by reviving the Principle of Art, and why this essentially renders theoretical aesthetics redundant.
References
Andrade, Bernardo. “Peirce’s Imaginative Community: On the Esthetic Grounds of Inquiry,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, (Tilburg University,2022): 1-25.
Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics: A New Translation. Translated with an Interpretive Essay, Notes and Glossary by Robert C Bartlett and Susan D Collins. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Arnold, Markus. “Images, diagrams, and narratives: Charles S. Peirce’s epistemological theory of mental diagrams,” Semiotica 186 1-4 (2011): 5-20.
Bertinetto, Alessandro. Aesthetics of Improvisation. Leiden: Brill, 2022.
Bowie, Andrew. Aesthetics and Subjectivity: from Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester University Press, 2003.
Bruns, Gerald. Review of Art and Aesthetics After Adorno, Jay M. Bernstein, Claudia Brodsky, Anthony J. Cascardi, Thierry de Duve, Aleš Erjavec, Robert Kaufman, and Fred Rush. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/art-and-aesthetics-after-adorno/ 2011.03.11
Bull, Malcolm. "Why is there the amount of Art that there is?", New Left Review (2025): 151 Jan/Feb.
Dahlin, Bo, “Epistemology, Technology, and Spiritual Science.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 17 3 (2021):68-103.
Gare, Arran E. “Against Posthumanism: Posthumanism as the World Vision of House-Slaves.” Borderless Philosophy 4 (2021): 1-56. https://philpapers.org/rec/GARAPP
Gare, Arran E. Review of "The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Western World." Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 8 1 (2012): 412-449.
Gare, Arran E. “Science, process philosophy and the image of man: the metaphysical foundations for a critical social science.” PhD thesis., Murdoch University, 1981. Libraries Australia ID 2512950
Gare, Arran E. “The Arts and the Radical Enlightenment: Gaining Liberty to Save the Planet.” The Structurist, 47/48 (2007/2008): 20-27.
Johnson, Mark. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
Kaushik, Rajiv. Art and Institution: Aesthetics in the Late Works of Merleau-Ponty. London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.
Kristeller, Paul Oscar. “The Modern System of the Arts: A study in the History of Aesthetics Part 1.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 12 4 (Oct. 1951): 496-527.
Leroi, Armand Marie. The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science. London: Bloomsbury Paperbacks, 2015.
MacIntyre, Alisdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
McGilchrist, Iain. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2010.
Polak, Fred, The Image of the Future. Translated and abridged Elise Boulding. Amsterdam, London, New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1973
Polanyi, Michael. The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1983.
Potter, Vincent G. Charles S Peirce: On Norms and Ideals. Fordham University Press, 1997.
Randall, John Herman Jr. Aristotle. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1960.
Ricoeur, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language. Routledge, 2003.
Roberts, David. Art and Enlightenment- Aesthetic Theory after Adorno. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1991.
Scheler, Max. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Translated by Manfred S. Frings and Richard L. Funk. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. The Philosophy of Art. Volume 58 Theory and History of Literature, Edited, translated and introduced by Douglas W Stott. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
Segall, Matthew D. “Poetic Imagination in the Speculative Philosophies of Plato, Schelling, and Whitehead.” Academia.edu. 5/10/2012:1-23.
Steinbuch, Thomas, and Haiyan Guo. “On Not Democratizing Art: Kant’s Cosmological Sublime Versus Nietzsche’s Party of Life and The Negative Aesthetics of Divergence: Querying Kaplama’s Super-Sensible Séance and Strong’s Magical Incantation of Transfiguration”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 21 1 (July 2025): 119–149.
Trimarchi, Nat. “Harmonising Humanity With Nature: Metaphor, the Person, and Art’s Higher Meaning”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 21 1 (2025b):11-118.
Trimarchi, Nat. “Peirce’s Suspended Second, and Art’s ‘Ethical Phenomenology’”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 20 2 (2024c): 318-401.
Trimarchi, N. J. 2024(a). Re-worlding the World: Schelling’s Philosophy of Art. NIPEA. Retrieved from https://nipea.info/philosophia-naturalis/re-worlding-the-world-schellings-philosophy-of-art/
Trimarchi, Nat. “Schelling’s ‘Art in the Particular’: Reorienting Final Cause.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 20 1 (2024b): 416–499.
Trimarchi, Nat. “The Aesthetics of Meaning”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 18 2 (2022): 251–304.
Trimarchi, Nat. “The Poles of Idea and Reality (and the De-futurising of Art and Humanity)”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 19 1 (2023): 426–457.
Trimarchi, Natale John 2025(a). The Way Out: Naturalising Art (for a New Mythology). Swinburne. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.25916/sut.28587830.v1
Voronsky, Aleksandr K. Art as the Cognition of Life: Selected Writings 1911-1936. Translated and edited by Frederick S Choate. Oak Park, Michigan: Mehring Books Inc. 1998.
Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society 1780-1950. Doubleday & Company Inc.,1960. Universal Digital Library https://archive.org/details/culturesociety17001850mbp/page/n3/mode/2up Accessed 21/05/23
Young, Alan. “Empathy, Evolution, and Human Nature.” in Empathy: From Bench to Bedside, Edited by Jean Decety, 22-36. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nat Trimarchi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.