Conatus as Viability: Spinoza’s Ethics and the Geometry of Persistence

Authors

  • Nobuchika Yamaki King’s College London
  • Tenna Churiki

Keywords:

Spinoza, Structural Realism, Free-energy principle, Viability theory, Naturalized metaphysics

Abstract

This paper reconstructs Spinoza’s Ethics as a formal theory of viable dynamical systems. It argues that conatus, the striving of each thing to persevere in its being, can be expressed as a viability constraint: the condition that the expected rate of persistence, E[dP/dt], remains non-negative. Within this framework, power (potentia) corresponds to a system’s viability function P(x, t), affect to its temporal derivative dP/dt, adequate ideas to predictive models that enhance expected viability, and freedom to the invariance of viability-optimizing behavior under perturbation. Extending this principle to collective and computational systems reveals an ethical and cognitive symmetry: actions and understandings that increase viability are virtuous, while those that diminish it are destructive. The resulting ontology identifies being with organization rather than substance, yielding a form of structural realism consistent with modern systems theory and the free-energy principle. Spinoza’s Ethics thus anticipates a geometry of persistence—a unified account of existence, cognition, and value grounded in the dynamics of self-maintaining systems.

References

Aubin, J.-P. (1991). Viability Theory. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Balibar, É. (1997). Spinoza and Politics. London: Verso.

Bickhard, M. H. (2009). The interactivist model, Synthese 166 (3):547-591

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.

Curley, E. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

De Haan, S. (2020). Enactive Psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deleuze, G. (1968). Spinoza et le problème de l’expression. Paris: Minuit.

Frijda, N. H. (2007). The Laws of Emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Friston, K. J. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787

Garrett, D. (2018). Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/ 10.1215/00318108-2008-043

Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lin, M. (2021). Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lloyd, G. (1996). Spinoza and the Ethics. London: Routledge.

Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Varela, F. J., & Maturana, H. R. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Viljanen, V. (2011). Spinoza’s Geometry of Power: The Dynamics of Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764434.001.0001

Downloads

Published

02-07-2026

How to Cite

Yamaki, N., & Churiki, T. (2026). Conatus as Viability: Spinoza’s Ethics and the Geometry of Persistence. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 22(2), 473–495. Retrieved from https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1524