The Synthetic Public

Epistemic Agency and the Erosion of Democratic Deliberation in the Age of LLMs

Authors

  • Konstantin Feofanov Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences

Keywords:

Synthetic Public, Simulation of Public Opinion, Epistemic Agency, Political Discourse, Deliberative Democracy, Large Language Models (LLMs)

Abstract

The article examines the emergence of “synthetic public” caused by the proliferation of network technologies, highlighting the resultant threats to epistemic agency and democratic deliberation. Key areas of analysis include simulation mechanisms, how public opinion is artificially manufactured, theory of deliberative democracy as the foundation of democratic political discourse, deliberation and simulation as opposing political tendencies, social epistemology as a normative analysis of ways to organize political discourse, the erosion and collapse of epistemic activity, and elections, which blur the dichotomy between “organic” public opinion and technologically mediated content. The article concludes that the synthetic public is not a step toward true democracy, but a harmful way to imitate and circumvent it. Finally, the article asserts the urgent need to safeguard citizens’ epistemic autonomy in the age of Large Language Models (LLMs).

References

Bessette, Joseph. 1980. Deliberative Democracy: The Majority Principle in Republican Government. Pp. 102-116 in How Democratic is the Constitution? Ed. Robert Goldwin and William Schambra. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

Chwalisz, Claudia et al. 2020. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publishing. 196 p.

Cohen, Joshua. 1996. Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. Pp. 95-119 in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Seyla Benhabib. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cohen, Joshua. 1997. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. Pp. 67-92 in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. James Bohman and William Rehg. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. 447 Pp.

Fishkin, James et al. 2025. Scaling Dialogue for Democracy: Can Automated Deliberation Create More Deliberative Voters? Perspectives on Politics, 23 (2): 1-18.

Fricker, Miranda (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 188 p.

Gandini, Alessandro et al. 2025. Conceptualising the “algorithmic public opinion”: Public opinion formation in the digital age. Dialogues on Digital Society. 0 (0): 1-16.

García-Marzá, Domingo, Calvo Patrici. 2024. Algorithmic democracy: A critical perspective based on deliberative democracy. Springer.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 704 S.

Habermas Jürgen. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 208 S.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 2 Bd. 1165 S.

Landemore, Hélène. 2024. Can AI Bring Deliberation to the Masses? Pp. 37-72 in Conversations in Philosophy, Law, and Politics. Ed. Ruth Chang and Amia Srinivasan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mansbridge, Jane et al. 2012. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. Pp. 1-26 in Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. John Parkinson, Jane Mansbridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, Melisa. 2025. Liberal and Deliberative Democracy in the Global South: Models, Functions, Practices. Politics and Governance, 13 (9814): 1-13.

Saura-García, Carlos. 2025. Synthetification of public opinion: impacts on deliberative democracies. Ethics and Information Technology, 27: 54.

Summerfield, Christopher et al. 2025. The impact of advanced AI systems on democracy. Nature Human Behaviour, 9: 2420-2430.

Volpe, Alessandro. 2025. Toward an artificial deliberation? On Google DeepMind’s “Habermas Machine”. Ethics and Information Technology, 27 (4).

Downloads

Published

02-07-2026

How to Cite

Feofanov, K. (2026). The Synthetic Public: Epistemic Agency and the Erosion of Democratic Deliberation in the Age of LLMs . Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 22(2), 107–124. Retrieved from https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1540