The Relevance of an Existential Conception of Nature
Keywords:Nature, existentialism, Heidegger, thrownness, phusis, Collingwood, insurance
It is often assumed that science provides the most accurate knowledge about nature. This view not only collapses distinctions between different forms of knowing but also results in a paradox whereby understanding what it means to exist in the world is dictated by practioners of science. In this essay I argue for the relevance of an existential conception of nature via the philosophy of Martin Heidegger, and how his notions of thrownness and phusis enable us to recognize a certain ethical bond to nature. I conclude with a critical analysis of liability insurance and actuarial science to demonstrate my points.
How to Cite
Mei, T. (2014). The Relevance of an Existential Conception of Nature. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 10(2), 138–157. Retrieved from https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/397