Indexicalism and Paradox
Keywords:Bensusan, Indexicalism, Antinomy, Levinas, Derrida, Modality, Metaphysics
I consider the longstanding connection, already mooted by Aristotle, between the project of metaphysics as the general science of “being qua being” and the apparently more specific structure of a metaphysics of possibility that is structured essentially by the force and dominance of the principle of non-contradiction. I reconstruct, from the alternative position of what Hilan Bensusan terms “indexicalism,” an antinomic structure of indexicality plausibly underlying at a basic level the paradoxical results of several significant arguments in the history of Western philosophy that bear (on their face) contradictory or antinomic conclusions and suggest that the these arguments are collectively sufficient to show that there cannot be an indexicalist “metaphysics of modality.” The antinomic arguments nevertheless bear, I argue in dialogue with Bensusan, Levinas, and Derrida, an important critical significance if directed, from an indexicalist standpoint, against the anthropogenic violence characteristic of the humanist thinking of metaphysical possibility and the extractive dominance over non-human others that that this thinking enables and promulgates.
Aristotle, Protrepticus (reconstruction), edited and translated by D. S. Hutchinson and Monte Ransome Johnson. http://www.protrepticus.info/protr2017x20.pdf, 2017. Accessed September 18, 2021.
Aristotle, Metaphysics. Transl. by D. Ross. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2 (Revised Oxford Translation). Princeton, NJ: Princeton U. Press, 1995.
Bensusan, Hilan. Indexicalism: Realism and the Metaphysics of Paradox. Edinburgh U. Press, 2021.
Cogburn, Jon. Cartesian Meditations: The Dialectics of Persistence in Form and Object.” Edinburgh U. Press, 2017.
Derrida, Jacques. “Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas.” In Writing and Difference, Transl. by Alan Bass. Chicago: U. of Chicago Press, 1978.
Fine, Kit, ‘Tense and Reality’, in Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 261–320.
Hegel, G. W. F. The Science of Logic. Transl. and edited by George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press, 2010.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Transl. and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press, 1998.
Kaplan, David, 1995. “A Problem in Possible-World Semantics.” In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Dianda Raffman, and Nicholas Asher, ed., Modality, Morality, and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press, 1995.
Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Transl. by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne U. Press, 1969.
Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Transl. by Alphonso Lingis. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1981.
Lewis, David, 1979. “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se,” The Philosophical Review 88:4 (Oct, 1979), pp. 513-43.
Lewis, David 1983. “Individuation by acquaintance and by stipulation.” The Philosophi¬cal Review 92:1, 3–32.
Lewis, David, 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Livingston, Paul M. 2017a. The Logic of Being: Realism, Truth, and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern U. Press.
Livingston, Paul M. 2017b. “Presentation and the Ontology of Consciousness”. Grazer Philosophische Studien 94 (2017), pp. 301-31.
Perry, John, 1977. “Frege on Demonstratives,” Philosophical Review, 86 (1977), pp. 474-97.
Perry, John. 1979. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical,” Nous 13:1, pp. 3-21.
Priest, G. 2002. Beyond the Limits of Thought, second edition. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002.
Ryle, Gilbert, 1939, “Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ II,” Mind 48: 191 (July 1939), pp. 302-25.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Paul M Livingston
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.