What’s So Good about the Good Will?
An Ontological Critique of Kant’s Axiomatic Moral Construct
Keywords:
Kant’s good will, Kant’s highest good, Kant’s moral theory, Kant’s moral ontology, the ontology of valueAbstract
Kant maintains that the only thing that is good in itself, and therefore good without limitation or qualification, is a good will. This is an objectionable claim in support of a controversial position. The problem is not just that the good will is not the only thing that is good in itself, which indeed it is not, but more importantly that the good will is not so much a thing that is good in itself as it is the good kind of a thing that is otherwise neither good nor bad in itself. The goodness of a good will is no more intrinsic than the goodness of a good act, good outcome, good attitude, good character, or good person. Nor is it even any more so than something as commonplace as a good laugh or a good cup of coffee. A good will, whatever else it may be, is a will that is good, much like how a good act is an act that is good, a good outcome is an outcome that is good, and so on with the other examples, not one of which is good for any reason other than the goodness predicated of the corresponding subject. This paper thus challenges Kant’s position on ontological grounds. It questions the validity of claiming intrinsic goodness for a complex construct whose goodness is in fact extrinsic to its substance. The objection is not that the good will might not turn out to be good after all, which is impossible by definition, designation, or stipulation, but that its goodness is axiomatic and derivative rather than intrinsic or fundamental.References
Allison, Henry Edward. 1990. “Wille, Willkür, and Gesinnung.” Chapter 7 of Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 129–145.
Aristotle. 1831–1870. Aristotelis Opera. Five volumes. Greek text of the complete works of Aristotle, prepared by the Prussian Academy of Sciences, under the general editorship of Immanuel Bekker. Berlin: Georg Reimer (Walter de Gruyter).
Aristotle. 2013. Eudemian Ethics. Translated and edited by Brad Inwood and Raphael Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle. 2014. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated with an introduction and notes by C. D. C. (Charles David Chanel) Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Aufderheide, Joachim, and Ralf M. Bader. 2015. The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Auxter, Thomas. 1979. “The Unimportance of Kant’s Highest Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 17:2 (April): 121–134.
Bader, Ralf M. 2015. “Kant’s Theory of the Highest Good.” Chapter 8 of The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant. Edited by Joachim Aufderheide and Ralf M. Bader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 183–213.
Barnes, Gerald W. 1971. “In Defense of Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good.” The Philosophical Forum 2:4 (Summer): 446–458.
Basaglia, Federica. 2016. “The Highest Good and the Notion of the Good as Object of Pure Practical Reason.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Edited by Thomas Höwing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 17–32.
Beck, Lewis White. 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1776. A Fragment on Government. Published anonymously as A Fragment on Government; Being an Examination of What Is Delivered, on the Subject of Government in General, in the Introduction to Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries: With a Preface, in Which Is Given a Critique on the Work at Large. London: John Thomas Payne, 1776. Second edition (“second edition, enlarged”) published in the author’s own name as A Fragment on Government; or, A Comment on the Commentaries: Being an Examination of What Is Delivered on the Subject of Government in General, in the Introduction to Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries: With a Preface, in Which Is Given a Critique on the Work at Large. London: Effingham William Wilson and William Pickering, 1823. Reprinted as part of the first volume of The Works of Jeremy Bentham, the first compilation of Bentham’s writings. Edited by John Bowring, published in twenty-two installments between 1838 and 1843, and reissued in eleven volumes upon completion. Edinburgh (William Tait) and London (William Simpkin and Richard Marshall), 1843, 221–295. Reprinted with the title A Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government, as part of The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, the standard critical edition of Bentham’s writings. Edited by James Henderson Burns and Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart. London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1977. Collected Works edition reissued in Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1789. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Printed privately in 1780 and published nine years later in London: John Thomas Payne and Son, 1789. Second edition (“a new edition, corrected by the author”) published in two volumes in London: William Pickering and Effingham William Wilson, 1823. The first volume contains chapters 1–12, the second volume contains chapters 13–17. Reprinted as part of the first volume of The Works of Jeremy Bentham, the first compilation of Bentham’s writings. Edited by John Bowring, published in twenty-two installments between 1838 and 1843, and reissued in eleven volumes upon completion. Edinburgh (William Tait) and London (William Simpkin and Richard Marshall), 1843, 1–154. Reprinted as part of The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, the standard critical edition of Bentham’s writings. Edited by James Henderson Burns and Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart. London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1970. Collected Works edition reprinted in paperback, with a new introduction by Frederick Rosen and an interpretive essay by Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart, in Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1829/1983. “Article on Utilitarianism.” Drafted in 1829 in two versions, one longer, the other shorter, neither one appearing in print, except in the form of anonymous excerpts or direct quotations, until 1983, when the original material was recovered in full from the corresponding manuscripts and reprinted as part of Deontology, Together with A Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), a compilation edited by Amnon Goldworth and published as a volume in The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, the standard critical edition of Bentham’s writings.
Bentham, Jeremy. 1834/1983. Deontology; or, The Science of Morality: In Which the Harmony and Co-incidence of Duty and Self-interest, Virtue and Felicity, Prudence and Benevolence, Are Explained and Exemplified. From the MSS. of Jeremy Bentham. Two volumes. Vol. 1: Theory of the Social Science and History of the Greatest-Happiness Principle. Vol. 2: Practice of the Social Science. Arranged and edited by John Bowring. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Browne, Green, and Longman. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1834. Recovered from the original manuscript and reprinted as part of Deontology, Together with A Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), a compilation edited by Amnon Goldworth and published as a volume in The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, the standard critical edition of Bentham’s writings.
Borges, Jorge Luis. 1939. “Pierre Menard, Autor del Quijote.” Sur 9:56 (May): 7–16. English edition available as “Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote” in two separate versions, one translated by James E. Irby as part of Labyrinths: Selected Stories & Other Writings (New York: New Directions, 1962), the other translated by Anthony Bonner as part of Ficciones (New York: Grove Press, 1962), the former a collection of translations, the latter the translation of a collection, Ficciones (Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores, 1944), both translated by various hands.
Bowman, Curtis. 2003. “A Deduction of Kant’s Concept of the Highest Good.” Journal of Philosophical Research 28: 45–63.
Bradley, Francis Herbert. 1876. Ethical Studies. New York: G. E. Stechert and Company. London: Henry S. King and Company. Second (“revised”) edition published posthumously in 1927 with additional notes by the author and reprinted in 1988 with an introduction by Richard Wollheim (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Brown, Étienne. 2020. “Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good: A Theologico-Political Interpretation.” Kantian Review 25:2 (June): 193–217.
Carlyle, Thomas. 1850. “Jesuitism” (1 August 1850). Eighth and final essay (“pamphlet”) in his Latter-Day Pamphlets. London: Chapman and Hall, 249–286.
Caswell, Matthew. 2006. “Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good, the Gesinnung, and the Theory of Radical Evil.” Kant-Studien 97:2: 184–209.
Denis, Lara. 2005. “Autonomy and the Highest Good.” Kantian Review 10: 33–59.
Dewey, John. 1891. Outlines of a Critical Theory of Ethics. Ann Arbor: Register Publishing Company. Reprinted as part of John Dewey: The Early Works, 1882–1898. Volume 3: 1889–1892. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1969, 237–388.
Dewey, John, and James Hayden Tufts. 1908. Ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Company. London: G. Bell and Sons. Second, “revised” edition, 1932. Second edition reprinted as part of John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925–1953. Volume 7: 1932. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985.
Engstrom, Stephen. 1992. “The Concept of the Highest Good in Kant’s Moral Theory.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52:4 (December): 747–780.
Engstrom, Stephen. 2014. “Ancient Insights in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Chapter 6 of Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide. Edited by Lara Denis and Oliver Sensen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–119.
Engstrom, Stephen. 2015. “The Complete Object of Practical Knowledge.” Chapter 6 of The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant. Edited by Joachim Aufderheide and Ralf M. Bader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–157.
Engstrom, Stephen. 2016. “The Determination of the Concept of the Highest Good.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Edited by Thomas Höwing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 89–108.
Esser, Andrea Marlen. 2016. “Applying the Concept of the Good: The Final End and the Highest Good in Kant’s Third Critique.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Edited by Thomas Höwing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 245–262.
Förster, Eckart. 2000. Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fremstedal, Roe. 2011. “The Concept of the Highest Good in Kierkegaard and Kant.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69:3 (June): 155–171.
Fremstedal, Roe. 2014. Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good: Virtue, Happiness, and the Kingdom of God. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Friedman, R. Zev. 1984. “The Importance and Function of Kant’s Highest Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22:3 (July): 325–342.
Fugate, Courtney. 2014. “The Highest Good and Kant’s Proof(s) of God’s Existence.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 31:2 (April): 137–158.
Giannini, Heidi Chamberlin. 2013. “Korsgaard and the Wille/Willkür Distinction: Radical Constructivism and the Imputability of Immoral Actions.” Kant Studies Online (KSO): 72–101.
Gkouvas, Triantafyllos. 2011. “The Practicality of Pure Reason. A Normative Defence of Kant’s Theory of Moral Motivation.” Eidos 14 (January–June): 152–191.
Godlove, Terry F., Jr. 1987. “Moral Actions, Moral Lives: Kant on Intending the Highest Good.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 25:1 (Spring): 49–64.
Green, Thomas Hill. 1883. Prolegomena to Ethics. Edited by Andrew Cecil Bradley. Published posthumously. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grote, John. 1870. An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy. Edited by Joseph Bickersteth Mayor. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Company. London: Bell and Daldy.
Guyer, Paul. 1990. “Feeling and Freedom: Kant on Aesthetics and Morality.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48:2 (Spring): 137–146. Reprinted with minor emendations as chapter 1 of Guyer’s Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 27–47.
Guyer, Paul. 2003. “Beauty, Systematicity and the Highest Good: Eckart Förster’s Kant’s Final Synthesis.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46:2: 195–214.
Hill, Thomas E. 1999. “Happiness and Human Flourishing in Kant’s Ethics.” Social Philosophy and Policy 16:1 (Winter): 143–175.
Hills, Alison. 2006. “Kant on Happiness and Reason.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 23:3 (July): 243–261.
Höwing, Thomas (ed.). 2016. The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hudson, Hud. 1991. “Wille, Willkür, and the Imputability of Immoral Actions.” Kant-Studien 82:2: 179–196.
Insole, Christopher. 2008. “The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Philosophy 83:325 (July): 333–351.
Kant, Immanuel. 1774–1785. Moral Mrongovius (MM). Kant’s lectures on moral philosophy as transcribed in class by his student Krzysztof Celestyn Mrongowiusz (1764–1855). Although lecture notes are traditionally cited by the name of the student whose name is on the notebook, the corresponding notes do not necessarily originate with that student, the contents possibly having been copied from one or more earlier sets of notes by others. There are two such notebooks in the case of Mrongovius: The earlier one, Moral Mrongovius 1 (MM1), dates back to the 1774–1777 period and almost certainly does not represent his personal notes, while the later one, Moral Mrongovius 2 (MM2), covers the winter semester of 1784–1785 and quite likely comprises his own notes. Mrongovius evidently took or audited the same class more than once but not at times as far apart as the notes would seem to indicate. References to his notebooks are to the standard Akademie pagination. MM1 = Akademie 27:3 (1979): 1395–1581 (the third [1979] of three separately published parts of vol. 27). MM2 = Akademie 29:2 (1983): 597–642 (the second [1983] of two separately published parts of vol. 29). The source consulted in the preparation of this paper, and both cited and quoted here, was an English translation of selections from Moral Mrongovius 2, specifically as it appears in a collection of lecture notes on Kant’s moral philosophy, published as Lectures on Ethics. Translated by Peter Heath. Edited by Jerome Borges Schneewind and Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Kant, Immanuel. 1781. Kritik der reinen Vernunft (KrV). Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch. Second edition, 1787. References in this paper use the Akademie pagination (KrV 3:1–552) with the standard A/B notation corresponding to the first (1781) and second (1787) editions. The English edition consulted most frequently, especially for direct quotations, was the translation by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood: Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Kant, Immanuel. 1785. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (GMS). Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch. References in this paper are to the standard Akademie pagination (GMS 4:385–463). English editions cited or quoted here include the following: (1) Thomas Kingsmill Abbott’s rendition as “Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals,” constituting part of his Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics (London: Longmans, Green, and Company, 1873, 1–84). (2) Mary J. Gregor’s rendition, with an introduction by Christine M. Korsgaard, as Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). (3) Lewis White Beck’s rendition as “Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals,” constituting part of his Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1949, 50–117). A revised version of Beck’s translation of the Grundlegung was published as part of Kant: Selections (New York: Macmillan, 1988, 244–298), but the formal second (“revised”) edition, representing the last version in Beck’s lifetime, was published as Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What Is Enlightenment? (New York: Macmillan, 1990). (4) Herbert James Paton’s rendition in The Moral Law: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (London: Hutchinson and Company, 1947, 1–84). Second edition, 1953. Third edition, 1956. All direct quotations are from Gregor’s translation, with the sole exception of a passage in the second paragraph of the third section, where her translation is compared with others.
Kant, Immanuel. 1788. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (KpV). Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch. References here are to the standard Akademie pagination (KpV 5:1–163). The English edition used for quotations was the translation by Mary J. Gregor: Critique of Practical Reason. Second edition, with a revised introduction by Andrews Reath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Translation originally published in 1997.
Kant, Immanuel. 1790. Kritik der Urteilskraft (KU). Berlin and Libau: Lagarde and Friedrich. Second edition, 1793. Third edition, 1799. References are to the standard Akademie pagination (KU 5:165–485). The English edition consulted most frequently, and either cited or quoted here, was the translation by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews: Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Kant, Immanuel. 1793. Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft (Religion). Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius. References are to the standard Akademie pagination (R 6:1–202). There are no direct quotations here in any language, but the English edition consulted most frequently was the translation by Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni, with an introduction by Robert Merrihew Adams: Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Kant, Immanuel. 1797. Die Metaphysik der Sitten (MS). Originally published in two parts, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (January 1797) and Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre (August 1797), reprinted later in the same year as a single volume titled Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius. References here are to the standard Akademie pagination (MS 6:203–493). The English edition used during the preparation of the present work was the translation by Mary J. Gregor: The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. The parts of Gregor’s translation corresponding to the initially separate publications, and thereby to the divisions in the first complete edition, are “Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right” and “Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Virtue.”
Kant, Immanuel. 1900–present. Immanuel Kants gesammelte Schriften. The Akademie edition: the standard critical edition of Kant’s collected works in German. Twenty-nine volumes in four parts. Part 1 (vols. 1–9): Werke. Part 2 (vols. 10–13): Briefwechsel. Part 3 (vols. 14–23): Handschriftlicher Nachlass. Part 4 (vols. 24–29): Vorlesungen. Edited by the Königlichen Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (vols. 1–22), the Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (vol. 23), and the Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen (vols. 24–29). Berlin: Georg Reimer (Walter de Gruyter).
Kleingeld, Pauline. 2016. “Kant on ‘Good’, the Good, and the Duty to Promote the Highest Good.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Edited by Thomas Höwing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 33–49.
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1986. “Aristotle and Kant on the Source of Value.” Ethics 96:3 (April): 486–505.
Lin, Cheng-Hao. 2019. “The Ambiguity of Kant’s Concept of the Highest Good: Finding the Correct Interpretation.” The Philosophical Forum 50:3 (Fall): 355–382.
Mackenzie, John Stuart. 1893. A Manual of Ethics. London: W. B. Clive and Company, University Correspondence College Press. Numerous editions and reprints. Second edition, 1894. Third edition, 1897. Fourth edition, 1900/1901. Fifth edition, 1915. Sixth edition, 1929. First two editions published with the subtitle “Designed for the Use of Students.” Subtitle dropped permanently starting with the third edition (“revised, enlarged, and in part rewritten”), published in London (W. B. Clive) and New York (Hinds and Noble). Fourth edition released with a shorter preface (June 1900) and a longer preface (February 1901), corresponding, respectively, to the 1900 and 1901 impressions. Fifth edition undertaken primarily to account for the growing influence of Moore following the publication of Principia Ethica (1903). Sixth edition significantly shorter despite covering a substantial amount of new material.
Mariña, Jacqueline. 2000. “Making Sense of Kant’s Highest Good.” Kant-Studien 91:3: 329–355.
Marwede, Florian. 2016. “Kant on Happiness and the Duty to Promote the Highest Good.” In The Highest Good in Kant’s Philosophy. Edited by Thomas Höwing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 51–69.
Meerbote, Ralf. 1982. “Wille and Willkür in Kant’s Theory of Action.” In Interpreting Kant. Edited by Moltke Stefanus Gram. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 69–84.
Menke, Christoph. 2008. “Aesthetic Reflection and Its Ethical Significance: A Critique of the Kantian Solution.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 34:1–2 (January): 51–63.
Mill, James. 1821. Elements of Political Economy. London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 1821. Second edition (“revised and corrected”), 1824. Third edition (“revised and corrected”), 1826.
Mill, James. 1823. Essays on Government, Jurisprudence, Liberty of the Press, and Law of Nations. London: J. Innes. Reprinted in 1825 and 1828. A collection of articles originally appearing separately in various issues of the Supplement to the fourth, fifth, and sixth editions of the Encyclopedia Britannica, a series of half-volume supplements published between 1815 and 1824, under the editorial supervision of MacVey Napier.
Mill, James. 1829. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. Two volumes. London: Baldwin and Cradock. Second edition published posthumously, with illustrative and critical notes by Alexander Bain, Andrew Findlater, and George Grote, edited with additional notes by John Stuart Mill. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1869.
Mill, John Stuart. 1861. Utilitarianism. Originally published as an essay in three parts in Fraser’s Magazine for Town and Country: chapters 1–2 in Fraser’s Magazine 64:382 (October 1861): 391–406; chapters 3–4 in Fraser’s Magazine 64:383 (November 1861): 525–534; chapter 5 in Fraser’s Magazine 64:384 (December 1861): 659–673. First edition in book form in London: Parker, Son, and Bourn, 1863. Several editions and numerous reprints. Fourth edition (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1871), the last in Mill’s lifetime, also available in Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society as part of vol. 10 of the Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Edited by John Mercel Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969, 203–259. References in this paper give the pagination of the original 1861 edition as well as that of the 1871 edition as it appears in the 1969 reprint in the definitive collection. Where the text differs between editions, quotations are from the 1861 edition, unless the passage was added later, in which case it is from the first edition in which it was added.
Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in 1922 with no alterations beyond the correction of “a few misprints and grammatical mistakes” as reported by the author in an addendum to the preface. A “revised edition” with an introduction by Thomas Baldwin was published in 1993, together with Moore’s incomplete “Preface to the Second Edition” and two essays: “Free Will” (1912) and “The Conception of Intrinsic Value” (1922). References in the present paper use the pagination of the 1993 edition, preceded by chapter and section numbers for the convenience of readers consulting any other edition.
Moran, Kate A. 2011. “The Ethical Community as Ground of Moral Action: An Interpretation of the Highest Good.” Chapter 4 of Rethinking Kant, vol. 3. Edited by Oliver Thorndike. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 78–99.
Munzel, G. Felicitas. 1995. “‘The Beautiful Is the Symbol of the Morally-Good’: Kant’s Philosophical Basis of Proof for the Idea of the Morally-Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33:2 (April): 301–330.
Murphy, Jeffrie G. 1965. “The Highest Good as Content for Kant’s Ethical Formalism: Beck versus Silber.” Kant-Studien 56:1: 102–110.
Nuyen, Anh Tuan. 1994. “Kant on God, Immortality, and the Highest Good.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 32:1 (Spring): 121–133.
O’Connell, Eoin. 2012. “Happiness Proportioned to Virtue: Kant and the Highest Good.” Kantian Review 17:2 (June): 257–279.
O’Connor, Daniel. 1982. “Kant’s Conception of Happiness.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 16:3 (September): 189–205.
O’Neill, Onora. 1975. Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press. Originally published under the name of Onora Nell as author. Second edition published as Onora O’Neill, together with a new introductory essay and additional bibliographic material, in Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Ostaric, Lara. 2010. “Works of Genius as Sensible Exhibitions of the Idea of the Highest Good.” Kant-Studien 101:1: 22–39.
Packer, Mark. 1983. “The Highest Good in Kant’s Psychology of Motivation.” Idealistic Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13:2 (May): 110–119.
Pasternack, Lawrence. 2017. “Restoring Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55:3 (July): 435–468.
Paton, Herbert James. 1947. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. London: Hutchinson’s University Library. Reprinted in Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1948.
Rawls, John. 2000. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Edited by Barbara Herman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Reath, Andrews. 1988. “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26:4 (October): 593–619.
Ridge, Michael. 2002. “Mill’s Intentions and Motives.” Utilitas 14:1 (March): 54–70.
Rossi, Philip J. 2005. The Social Authority of Reason: Kant’s Critique, Radical Evil, and the Destiny of Humankind. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Sidgwick, Henry. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan. Numerous editions and reprints. Sixth (1901) and seventh (1907) editions published posthumously, the sixth with the personal revisions and further instructions of the author, the seventh (and final) with minor editorial emendations.
Sidgwick, Henry. 1879. “The Establishment of Ethical First Principles.” Mind 4:13 (January): 106–111.
Silber, John R. 1959a. “Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good as Immanent and Transcendent.” The Philosophical Review 68:4 (October): 469–492.
Silber, John R. 1959b. “The Metaphysical Importance of the Highest Good as the Canon of Pure Reason in Kant’s Philosophy.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 1:2 (Summer): 233–244.
Silber, John R. 1960a. “The Copernican Revolution in Ethics: The Good Reexamined.” Kant-Studien 51:1–4: 85–101.
Silber, John R. 1960b. “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Religion.” Introductory essay in the second edition (with corrections and revisions) of Immanuel Kant: Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone. Translated, with an introduction and notes, by Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson. New York: Harper Torchbooks (Harper and Row Publishers), 1960, lxxix–cxxxiv. Translation originally published, without Silber’s essay, in La Salle: The Open Court Publishing Company, 1934.
Silber, John R. 1963. “The Importance of the Highest Good in Kant’s Ethics.” Ethics 73:3 (April): 179–197.
Silber, John R. 1974. “Procedural Formalism in Kant’s Ethics.” The Review of Metaphysics 28:2 (December): 197–236.
Simmons, Lance. 1993. “Kant’s Highest Good: Albatross, Keystone, Achilles Heel.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 10:4 (October): 355–368.
Smith, Steven G. 1984. “Worthiness to Be Happy and Kant’s Concept of the Highest Good.” Kant-Studien 75:1–4: 168–190.
Sorley, William Ritchie. 1885. On the Ethics of Naturalism. Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons. Second (“revised”) edition published in 1904 as The Ethics of Naturalism: A Criticism.
Sussman, David. 2015. “The Highest Good: Who Needs It?” Chapter 9 of The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant. Edited by Joachim Aufderheide and Ralf M. Bader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 214–241.
Vatansever, Saniye. 2021. “Kant’s Coherent Theory of the Highest Good.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89:3 (June): 263–283.
Villarán, Alonso. 2013. “Overcoming the Problem of Impossibility in Kant’s Idea of the Highest Good.” Journal of Philosophical Research 38: 27–41.
Villarán, Alonso. 2015. “Overcoming the Problems of Heteronomy and Derivation in Kant’s Idea of the Highest Good.” The Philosophical Forum 46:3 (Fall): 287–306.
Villarán, Alonso. 2017. “Kant’s Highest Good: The ‘Beck-Silber Controversy’ in the Spanish-Speaking World.” Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers 34:1 (January): 57–81.
Watson, Gary. 1983. “Kant on Happiness in the Moral Life.” Philosophy Research Archives 9: 79–108.
Wellman, Carl P. 1959. “A Reinterpretation of Mill’s Proof.” Ethics 69:4 (July): 268–276.
West, Henry Robison. 1972. “Reconstructing Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Mind (New Series): 81:322 (April): 256–257.
West, Henry Robison. 1982. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Chapter 1 of The Limits of Utilitarianism. Edited by Harlan B. Miller and William Hatton Williams. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 23–34.
West, Henry Robison. 2004. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Chapter 6 of An Introduction to Mill’s Utilitarian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118–145.
West, Henry Robison. 2006. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Chapter 7 of The Blackwell Guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 174–183.
West, Henry Robison. 2017. “The Proof.” Chapter 22 of A Companion to Mill. Edited by Christopher Macleod and Dale E. Miller. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, 328–341.
Wike, Victoria S. 1987–1988. “Kant on Happiness.” Philosophy Research Archives 13: 79—90.
Wike, Victoria S. 1987. “The Role of Happiness in Kant’s Groundwork.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 21:1 (March): 73—78.
Wike, Victoria S. 1994. Kant on Happiness in Ethics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wike, Victoria S., and Ryan L. Showler. 2010. “Kant’s Concept of the Highest Good and the Archetype-Ectype Distinction.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 44:4 (December): 521–533.
Wilbur, James B. 1970. “Kant’s Criteria of Art and the Good Will.” Kant-Studien 61:1–4: 372–380.
Wood, Allen W. 2003. “The Good Will.” Philosophical Topics 31:1–2 (Spring–Fall): 457–484.
Wuerth, Julian. 2014. Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zammito, John H. 1992. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Zeldin, Mary-Barbara. 1971. “The Summum Bonum, The Moral Law, and the Existence of God.” Kant-Studien 62: 43–54.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Necip Fikri Alican
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
