Biological Evolution, Sociocultural Evolution, Cosmological Evolution
The Search for Links
Keywords:
Entropy, Information, Emergence, Evolution, Transcendental Philosophy, Biosemiotics, Quantum MechanicsAbstract
This article brings together transcendental philosophy, biosemiotics and quantum mechanics to derive a unified theory of biological, sociocultural and cosmological evolution. It is argued that all three of them are characterized by the evolution of emerging subjectivity from the objective world following a natural law of emergence. The determined final end of causation, it is argued with Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Willhelm Joseph von Schelling and John Archibald Wheeler, is to posit its own creation in observation.
References
AKE, STACEY E., ‘Consciousness’, in Donald Favareau, Paul Cobley, and Kalevi Kull (eds.), A More Developed Sign. Interpreting the Work of Jesper Hoffmeyer (Tartu semiotics library, 10, Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 2012), 75–9.
AZCARATE, ASUNCION LOPEZ-VARELY, ‘Emergence’, in Donald Favareau, Paul Cobley, and Kalevi Kull (eds.), A More Developed Sign. Interpreting the Work of Jesper Hoffmeyer (Tartu semiotics library, 10, Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 2012), 115–8.
BEKENSTEIN, JACOB D., ‘Information in the holographic universe’, Scientific American, 289/2 (2003), 58–65.
BRIER, SØREN, Cybersemiotics: Why Information is not enough! (Toronto Studies in Semiotics and Communication; Repr. in pbk, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2014).
BURGESS, ANTHONY, 1985 (New edition with an introduction by Andrew Biswell, London: Serpent's Tail, 2013).
CANNIZZARO, SARA, ‘Where Did Information Go? Reflections on the Logical Status of Information in a Cybernetic and Semiotic Perspective’, Biosemiotics, 6/1 (2013), 105–23.
CARTWRIGHT, JON, ‘Quantum of solitude’, New Scientist, 231/3082 (2016), 30–4.
CHALMERS, DAVID J., ‘Strong and Weak Emergence’, in Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (eds.), The re-emergence of emergence. The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion / edited by Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 244–56.
CLAYTON, PHILIP, Mind and emergence: From quantum to consciousness (Oxford [England], New York: Oxford University Press, 2004) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=5602472>.
CLAYTON, PHILIP, and SCHWARTZ, ANDREW, What is ecological civilization?: Crisis, hope, and the future of the planet, John B. Cobb (Toward ecological civilization series, volume 18, Anoka, Minnesota: Process Century Press, 2019).
COBLEY, PAUL, ‘Subjectivity’, in Donald Favareau, Paul Cobley, and Kalevi Kull (eds.), A More Developed Sign. Interpreting the Work of Jesper Hoffmeyer (Tartu semiotics library, 10, Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 2012), 274–7.
COBLEY, PAUL, and STJERNFELT, FREDERIK, ‘Scaffolding Development and the Human Condition’, Biosemiotics, 8/2 (2015), 291–304.
DACE, TED, ‘Evolution as Nature's Trajectory from Computation to Narration’, Cosmos and History, 18/2 (2022), 175–227 <https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1052>.
DAVIES, PAUL C. W., ‘The Physics of Downward Causation’, in Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (eds.), The re-emergence of emergence. The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion / edited by Philip Clayton and Paul Davies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 35–52.
DAWKINS, RICHARD, The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design / Richard Dawkins (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2015).
——, The Selfish Gene, 40th anniversary edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).
DENNETT, DANIEL, Consciousness explained (London: Penguin, 1993).
DUVE, CHRISTIAN de, ‘The origin of eukaryotes: a reappraisal’, Nature Reviews Genetics, 8/5 (2007), 395–403.
EPPERSON, MICHAEL, Quantum mechanics and the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (American philosophy series, no. 14; 1st paperback printing, New York: Fondham University Press, 2012).
EVERETT, HUGH, ‘The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Dissertation (Princeton, Princeton University, 1956).
——, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition by Hugh Everett, III, with Papers by J. A. Wheeler, B. S. Dewitt, L. N. Cooper and D. van Echten, and N. Graham, Edited by Byce S. DeWitt and Neill Graham (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973).
FICHTE, JOHANN GOTTLIEB, Darstellung der Wissenschaftslehre (Kindle edition, Altenmünster: Jazzybee Verlag, 2012).
——, Über den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre (Erweiterte Ausgabe, Altenmünster: Jazzybee Verlag, 2012).
——, Grundlage der gesammten Wissenschaftslehre (1. Auflage, Berlin: Contumax; Hofenberg, 2017).
FRAUEN, JAN-BOJE, ‘The Compulsions of Interdependence: Norbert Elias’ Civilizing Process as Evolutionary Realism’, The Review of International Affairs, 70/1147 (2019), 5–21.
——, ‘The Machinery for Change. A historical Analysis of the Roots of Liberal-representative Democracy, a critical Approach towards forced Democratizations and an Outlook on the Future Evolution of the liberal Order’, European Journal of Political Science Studies, 2/2 (2019) <https://oapub.org/soc/index.php/EJPSS/article/view/535>.
——, ‘Fire & Language. The Two-Faced Process of Progress in Deep-Structural Sociocultural Evolution’, World Futures, 76/4 (2020), 189–213.
——, ‘Self, Singularity, Super-Self? On Subjectivity in Super-Connectivity’, Journal of Posthuman Studies, 5/2 (2021), 130–49.
——, ‘The End of the I? A Biosemiotic Approach to Super-connectivity’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 17/1 (2021), 159–95.
——, ‘From Big Brother to the Big Bang. Self, Science and Singularity in Orwell's 1984’, Utopian Studies, 33/3 (2022), 406–23.
——, ‘Survival, freedom, urge and the absolute: on an antinomy in the subject’, Int J Philos Relig, 91/1 (2022), 63–85 <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11153-021-09812-z#notes>.
——, ‘On the subject part I: what is the subject?’, Qeios, 2023 <https://www.qeios.com/read/KUDU3X>.
——, ‘On the subject part II: what does the subject do?’, Qeios, 2023 <https://www.qeios.com/read/MK11DO>.
——, On the subject part III: what is the subject’s end? (2023).
GARE, ARRAN, ‘Biosemiotics and Causation. Defending Biosemiotics through Rosen’s Theoretical Biology or Integrating Biosemiotics and Anticipatory Systems Theory’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 15/1 (2019), 31–62.
——, ‘Consciousness, Mind and Spirit’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 15/2 (2019), 236–64.
——, ‘Semiosis and Information: Meeting the Challenge of Information Science to Post-Reductionist Biosemiotics’, Biosemiotics, 13/3 (2020), 327–46.
——, ‘Integrating Biosemiotics and Biohermeneutics in the Quest for Ecological Civilization as a Practical Utopia’, Cosmos and History, 18/2 (2022), 22–47 <https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1061>.
GOFF, PHILIP, SEAGER, WILLIAM, and ALLEN-HERMANSON, SEAN, Panpsychism (2001) <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/panpsychism/>, accessed 14 Sep 2023.
HAMILTON, W. D., ‘The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I’, Journal of theoretical biology, 7/1 (1964), 1–16.
——, ‘The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II’, Journal of theoretical biology, 7/1 (1964), 17–52.
HARMAN, GRAHAM, Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything / Graham Harman (London: Pelican, 2017).
HEGEL, GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH, Phänomenologie des Geistes (3. Auflage, Hamburg: Nikol, 2019).
HEIDEGGER, MARTIN, Being and Time (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).
HOBBES, THOMAS, TUCK, RICHARD, GEUSS, RAYMOND et al., Hobbes: "Leviathan" (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought; Rev. ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
HOFFMEYER, JESPER, Signs of Meaning in the Universe (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996).
——, ‘The Semiotic Body’, Biosemiotics, 1/2 (2008), 169–90.
——, Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2009).
——, ‘Introduction: Semiotic Scaffolding’, Biosemiotics, 8/2 (2015), 153–8.
——, ‘Semiotic Scaffolding of Multicellularity’, Biosemiotics, 8/2 (2015), 159–71.
HOFFMEYER, JESPER, and STJERNFELT, FREDERIK, ‘The Great Chain of Semiosis. Investigating the Steps in the Evolution of Semiotic Competence’, Biosemiotics, 9/1 (2016), 7–29.
HOLMBERG, RAFAEL, ‘The Indifference of Objectivity to Difference and Identity’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 18/2 (2022), 112–28 <https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1059>.
JAROŠ, FILIP, and MARAN, TIMO, ‘Humans on Top, Humans among the Other Animals: Narratives of Anthropological Difference’, Biosemiotics, 12/3 (2019), 381–403.
KANT, IMMANUEL, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Edited by Jens Timmermann (Philosophische Bibliothek, Bd. 505, Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1998).
——, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, Edited by Heiner Klemme and Horst D. Brandt (Philosophische Bibliothek, Bd. 506, Hamburg: F. Meiner, 2003).
KAUFFMAN, STUART, ‘Evolution beyond Newton, Darwin, and entailing law. the origin of complexity in the evolving biosphere’, in C. H. Lineweaver, Paul C. W. Davies, and Michael Ruse (eds.), Complexity and the Arrow of Time (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 162–91.
KAUFFMAN, STUART A., and GARE, ARRAN, ‘Beyond Descartes and Newton: Recovering life and humanity’, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 119/3 (2015), 219–44.
KULL, KALEVI, ‘Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: Building biosemiotics’, Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 10/1 (2003), 47–60.
——, ‘Beyond Word: On the Semiotic Mechanisms’, Biosemiotics, 7/3 (2014), 465–70.
KULL, KALEVI, and VELMEZOVA, EKATERINA, ‘Jesper Hoffmeyer: Biosemiotics Is a Discovery’, Biosemiotics, 12/3 (2019), 373–9.
LIBBY, ERIC, and RAINEY, PAUL B., ‘A conceptual framework for the evolutionary origins of multicellularity’, Physical biology, 10/3 (2013), 35001–10.
LITCHFIELD, GEORGE, ‘Matter-Information Equivalence’, Cosmos and History, 18/2 (2022), 457–66 <https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/856>.
MACALLAN, BRIAN, ‘Are There Problems with Panentheism? A Critical Analysis of Philip Clayton’s Response to Current Challenges’, Cosmos and History, 18/2 (2022), 369–79 <https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1053>.
MISNER, CHARLES W., THORNE, KIP S., and ZUREK, WOJCIECH H., ‘John Wheeler, Relativity, and Quantum Information’, Physics Today, 62/4 (2009), 40–6.
NESTERUK, ALEXEI V., ‘A "Participatory Universe" of J. A. Wheeler as an Intentional Correlate of Embodied Subjects and an Example of Purposiveness in Physics’, Journal of Siberian Federal University, 6/3 (2013), 1–22.
NIETZSCHE, FRIEDRICH, Also sprach Zarathustra: Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen (Insel-Taschenbuch Insel-Klassik, 4511; 1. Aufl., Berlin: Insel-Verl, 2011).
OSTDIEK, GERALD, ‘Me, Myself, and Semiotic Function: Finding the “I” in Biology’, Biosemiotics, 9/3 (2016), 435–50.
PASTERNACK, LAWRENCE, and FUGATE, COURTNEY, ‘Kant’s Philosophy of Religion’, 2021 <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-religion/>, accessed 11 Sep 2023.
PETRILLI, SUSAN, ‘Semioindividuality’, in Donald Favareau, Paul Cobley, and Kalevi Kull (eds.), A More Developed Sign. Interpreting the Work of Jesper Hoffmeyer (Tartu semiotics library, 10, Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, 2012), 243–7.
PRICE, G. R., ‘Selection and covariance’, Nature, 227/5257 (1970), 520–1.
RAJAN, TILOTTAMA, ‘The Vitality of Idealism: Life and Evolution in Schelling’s and Hegel’s Systems’, in Joel Faflak (ed.), Marking Time (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018), 239–69.
RICHARDS, ROBERT J., ‘Did Goethe and Schelling endorse species evolution?’, Marking Time: Romanticism and Evolution, 2017, 219–38.
ROVELLI, CARLO, The order of time, Translated by Simon Carnell and Erica Segre (UK: Penguin Books, 2019).
SCHELLING, FRIEDRICH WILHELM JOSEPH von, Über die Natur der Philosophie als Wissenschaft: Erlanger Vorträge (Kindle-version: Amazon, 2011) <https://www.amazon.de/%C3%9Cber-die-Natur-Philosophie-Wissenschaft-ebook/dp/B0057JZB9E/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1668113006&sr=1-1>.
——, Von der Weltseele: Eine Hypothese der höhern Physik zur Erklärung des allgemeinen Organismus (1. Auflage, Berlin: Contumax; Hofenberg, 2016).
——, Stuttgarter Privatvorlesungen (Kindle-version: Amazon, 2018) <https://www.amazon.de/Stuttgarter-Privatvorlesungen-Friedrich-Wilhelm-Schelling-ebook/dp/B07DNMPDGT/ref=sr_1_1?__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&crid=2644OBRYZE337&keywords=Stuttgarter+Privatvorlesungen+Schelling&qid=1668114089&s=digital-text&sprefix=stuttgarter+privatvorlesungen+schelling%2Cdigital-text%2C79&sr=1-1>.
SHAROV, ALEXEI A., ‘Functional Information: Towards Synthesis of Biosemiotics and Cybernetics’, Entropy, 12/5 (2010), 1050–70.
SHAROV, ALEXEI A., MARAN, TIMO, and TØNNESSEN, MORTEN, ‘Comprehending the Semiosis of Evolution’, Biosemiotics, 9/1 (2016), 1–6.
SNOW, C. P., The Two Cultures (Canto, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
THOMSON, TERRENCE, ‘The Idea of Nature as a Structure’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 18/2 (2022), 1–21 <https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1048>.
TØNNESSEN, MORTEN, SHAROV, ALEXEI A., and MARAN, TIMO, ‘Jesper Hoffmeyer’s Biosemiotic Legacy’, Biosemiotics, 12/3 (2019), 357–63.
TURNER, J. SCOTT, ‘Semiotics of a Superorganism’, Biosemiotics, 9/1 (2016), 85–102.
VANCHURIN, VITALY, ‘The world as a neural network’, Entropy, 22/11 (2020), 1210.
VEIT, WALTER, ‘Evolution of multicellularity: cheating done right’, Biol Philos, 34/3 (2019).
VELLAI, TIBOR, and VIDA, GABOR, ‘The origin of eukaryotes: the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266/1428 (1999), 1571–7.
WHEELER, JOHN ARCHIBALD, ‘Include the Observer in the Wave Function?’, in Jose Leite Lopes and Michel Paty (eds.), Quantum Mechanics, Half a Century Later. Papers of a Colloquium on fifty Years of Quantum Mechanics, Held at the University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, May 2-4, 1974 (Dordrecht, Holland, Boston, USA: D. Reidel Publishing, 1974), 1–19.
——, ‘The Universe as Home for Man. Puzzles attached to consciousness, the quantum principle, and how the universe came into being suggest that the greatest discoveries are yet to come’, American Scientist, 62/6 (1974), 683–91.
——, ‘Genesis and Observership’, in Robert E. Butts and Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences. Part two of the Procedings of the fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London, Ontario, Canada-1975 (Dordrecht, Holland, Boston, USA: D. Reidel Publishing, 1975), 3–35.
——, ‘Information, physics, quantum: The search for links’, in Anthony Hey (ed.), Feynman and Computation (Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2018), 309–36.
WHEELER, JOHN ARCHIBALD, and FORD, KENNETH WILLIAM, Geons, black holes, and quantum foam: A life in physics (New York: Norton, 2000).
WHEELER, WENDY, The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2006).
WIGNER, EUGENE PAUL, ‘Remarks on the Mind-Body Question’, in Eugene Paul Wigner, Jagdish Mehra, and A. S. Wightman (eds.), Philosophical reflections and syntheses (New York: Springer, 1997), 247–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jan-Boje Frauen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
