On -acãrájai and comparison

Transformations from Ayoreo Ethnography

Authors

  • Leif Grünewald Universidade do Estado do Pará

Keywords:

Comparison, Chaco, Social Philosophy

Abstract

Social anthropologists have long appreciated the notion of comparison as an important conceptual tool in the discipline. In this paper I ponder the meanings implicit to an Ayoreo (a Zamucoan speaking group living in Paraguayan Chaco) notion of ‘comparison’ through the idiom of what they describe as -acãrájai and the sets of transformations it enacts. In proposing that Ayoreo ontology is inherently comparative, the aim of this article is not just to provide an ethnographic account of different contexts of Ayoreo lived world, be that as it may, but also to optimistically present a daunting task to an anthropological way of thinking about the notion of comparison. By addressing a question on how we can experience ethnographically how the differences compared by Ayoreo people are themselves differently comparing and redefining everything as their variants, I attempt to list similarities and dissimilarities between the concept of -acãrájai and the anthropological notion of comparison and they appeared to me through my own comparative/ethnographic apparatus and to raise awareness of misunderstandings between them,  to redefine our own way of making identities and differences through the notion of comparison by defining it by its differential relations to the notion of -acãrájai. For it, this paper examines how one intellectual object twists the other and how the background from which each one of them emerge are placed on the same footing, in a manner that -acãrájai and comparison are reciprocally constitutive of each other.

References

Boas, F. (1896). “The Limitations of the Comparative Method of Anthropology”. Science. Vol. 4, No. 103 (Dec. 18, 1896), pp. 901-908.

Candea, M. (2016). “De Deux Modalités de La Comparaison En Anthropologie Sociale.” L’Homme 218: 183–218.

__________. (2019). Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Fox, R. & Gingrich, A. (2002). Anthropology, by Comparison. London: Routledge.

Gad, C. & Brunn Jensen, C. (2016). “Lateral comparisons”. In Practising comparison: logics, relations, collaborations ed. J. Deville , M . Guggenheim and Z . Hrdlickova . Manchester : Mattering Press.

Gow, P. (1991). Of Mixed Blood: Kinship and History in Peruvian Amazonia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

__________. (2001). An Amazonian Myth and its History. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hewlett, C. (2013). History, Kinship And Comunidad: Learning To Live Together Amongst Amahuaca People On The Inuya River In The Peruvian Amazon. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Social Anthropology. University of Saint Andrews.

Handler, R. (2009). “The uses of incommensurability in anthropology”. New Literary History 40, 627-647

Holy, L. (1987). Comparative Anthropology. Oxford: Basil, Blackwell. 1–21.

Humphrey, C. (2016). “Placing self amid others: a Mongolian technique of comparison”. L’Homme. Revue française d’anthropologie. 151-181.

Kuper, A. (2002). “Comparison and contextualization: reflection on South Africa.” In: Fox, Anthropology, by Comparison. Fox, Richard G. and Gingrich, Andre, (eds.). Routledge, London, UK, pp. 143-167.

Maniglier, P. (2016). “Anthropological Meditations: Discourse on Comparative Method”. In: Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology. Ed. Charbonnier, P. Salmon, G. and Skafish, P. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Mead, M. (1955) “Theoretical Setting—1954,”. In: Childhood in Contemporary Cultures Margaret Mead and Martha Wolfenstein. (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Meyer, B, (2017). “Comparison as critique”. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7(1): 509–515.

Salmon, G. (2013). “De la délégation ontologique. Naissance de l’anthropologie néo-classique”. Paper delivered at Colloquium ‘Métaphysiques comparées: la philosophie à l’épreuve de l’anthropologie’. Centre Culturel International de Cérisy, July 2013. Unpublished

Souriau, E. (2015). The different modes of existence. Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing

Susnik, B. (1969). Chamacocos: Cambio Cultural. Museo Etnográfico "Andrés Barbero,"

Van der Veer, P. (2016). The Value of Comparison. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Viveiros de Castro, E. (1996). “Os pronomes cosmológicos e o perspectivismo ameríndio”. Mana 2(2).

__________. (2002). A Inconstância da Alma Selvagem e Outros Ensaios de Antropologia. São Paulo: Cosac & Naify

__________. (2004) “Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation.” Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2 (1): 3–22.

__________. (2011a). “Zeno and the art of anthropology: of lies, beliefs, paradoxes, and other truths”. Common Knowledge 17( 1 ): 128– 45 .

__________. (2015). “Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 33( 1 ): 2 – 17

Wagner, R. (1981). The Invention of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Downloads

Published

26-07-2024

How to Cite

Grünewald, L. (2024). On -acãrájai and comparison: Transformations from Ayoreo Ethnography. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 20(1), 221–240. Retrieved from http://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1113