Arguments Against Methodological Naturalism and Their Roots in Metaphysics
Keywords:
methodological naturalism, meodological anti-naturalism, presuppositionalism thesis, epistemic frameworksAbstract
The article analyzes main arguments against methodological naturalism and shows their roots in specific metaphysics. A review of the arguments against this form of naturalism presented in this paper lends credence to the thesis that none of the arguments against methodological naturalism discussed here forces one to abandon naturalism.
References
Ackerman Paul D. and Williams Bob, Kansas Tornado: The 1999 Science Curriculum Standards Battle, Institute for Creation Research, El Cajon, California 1999.
Aikin Scott F., Harbour Michael, and Talisse Robert B., ‘Nagel on Public Education and Intelligent Design’, Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 35, 2010, pp. 209-219, https://tiny.pl/gkfh3 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Akins Kathleen (ed.), Perception, Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, vol. 5, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 1996.
Arabatzis Theodore, ‘Can a Historian of Science Be a Scientific Realist?’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 68, no. 3, Supplement, 2001, pp. S531-S541.
Ayala Francisco J., ‘Darwin’s Greatest Discovery: Design without Designer’, in Avise and Ayala (eds.), In the Light of Evolution…, pp. 3-21, https://tiny.pl/tx8s2 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Ayala Francisco J., ‘Darwin’s Revolution’, in Campbell and Schoff (eds.), Creative Evolution…, pp. 1-18.
Avise John C. and Ayala Francisco J. (eds.), In the Light of Evolution: Volume I: Adaptation and Complex Design, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2007.
Baergen Ralph, ‘The Influence of Cognition Upon Perception: The Empirical Story’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 71, no. 1, 1993, pp. 13-23.
Bartlett Jonathan and Holloway Eric (eds.), Naturalism and Its Alternatives in Scientific Methodologies: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Alternatives to Methodological Naturalism, Blyth Institute Press, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 2017.
Bartlett Jonathan, ‘Philosophical Shortcomings of Methodological Naturalism and the Path Forward’, in Bartlett and Holloway (eds.), Naturalism and Its Alternatives…, pp. 13-37.
Bartlett Jonathan, ‘Philosophical Shortcomings of Methodological Naturalism and the Path Forward’, in Bartlett and Holloway (eds.), Naturalism and Its Alternatives…, pp. 13-37, https://tiny.pl/tr32k (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Bauer Henry H., Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth, McFarland & Company, Jefferson 2012.
Bauman Michael (ed.), Man and Creation. Perspectives on Science and Theology, Hillsdale College Press, Hillsdale, Michigan 1993.
Beckwith Francis J., ‘Public Education, Religious Establishment, and the Challenge of Intelligent Design’, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, vol. 17, no. 2, 2003, pp. 461-520, https://tiny.pl/tmp7d (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Behe Michael J., Darwin’s Black Box. The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, Free Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney 2006.
Behe Michael J., ‘Irreducible Complexity: Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution’, in Ruse and Dembski (eds.), Debating Design…, pp. 352-370.
Behe Michael J., ‘Molecular Machines: Experimental Support for the Design Inference’, in Pennock (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism…, pp. 241-256.
Brand Leonard, ‘Naturalism: Its Role in Science’, Origins, no. 64, 2015, pp. 21-37, https://tiny.pl/ww5q9 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Brightman Edgar Sheffield, ‘An Empirical Approach to God’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 44, no. 2, 1937, pp. 147-169, https://tiny.pl/wwfgs (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Brunschvicg Leon, L’Expérience Humaine Et La Causalité Physique, Felix Alcan, Paris 1922, https://tiny.pl/wwftj (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Buell Jon and Hearn Virginia (eds.), Darwinism: Science or Philosophy. Proceedings of a Symposium Entitled Darwinism: Scientific Inference or Philosophical Preference? Held on the Southern Methodist University campus in Dallas, Texas, USA, March 26-28, 1992, Foundation for Thought and Ethics, Dallas 1997.
Bugge T.H., Kombrinck K.W., Flick M.J., Daugherty C.C., Danton M.J., and Degen J.L., ‘Loss of Fibrinogen Rescues Mice from the Pleiotropic Effects of Plasminogen Deficiency’, Cell, vol. 87, 1996, pp. 709-719.
Bylica Piotr, ‘Główne założenia i problemy teizmu naturalistycznego w sprawie relacji sfery nadprzyrodzonej i świata przyrodniczego’, in Dyk (ed.), Sozologia systemowa. Vol. IV…, pp. 55-95, https://tiny.pl/q3m1d (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Bylica Piotr, ‘NOMA as the Cure for Conflict Between Science and Religion: Reply to Ludwik Kowalski’s Commentary on the NOMA Principle’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, vol. 11, 2014, pp. 29-34, https://tiny.pl/tq5v2 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Campbell John Angus and Meyer Stephen C. (eds.), Darwinism, Design and Public Education, Michigan State University Press, East Lansing 2003.
Campbell John H. and Schoff J.W. (eds.), Creative Evolution!?, Jones and Bartlett, New York 1994.
Chela-Flores Julian and Seckbach Joseph, ‘Divine Action and Evolution by Natural Selection. A Possible and Necessary Dialogue’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 1035-1048.
Cohen Robert S. and Wartofsky Marx W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, 1964/1966. In Memory of Norwood Russell Hanson, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht 1967.
Colodny Robert G. (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1965.
Coyne George V., Heller Michael [Michał], A Comprehensible Universe. The Interplay of Science and Theology, Springer-Verlag, New York 2008
Coyne SJ George V., ‘Evolution and Intelligent Design. Who Needs God?’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. 9-26.
Crombie Alistair Cameron (ed.), Scientific Change: Historical Studies in the Intellectual, Social and Technical Conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention, from Antiquity to the Present, Symposium on the History of Science, University of Oxford 9th-15th July 1961, Heinemann, London 1963.
Darwin Charles, Autobiography of Charles Darwin with Two Appendices by His Son Francis Darwin, Rupa & Co., New Delhi 2003, https://tiny.pl/wwfgl (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Darwin Charles, The Origin of Species, P. Collier & Son, New York 1909, https://tiny.pl/wwfg9 (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Dean Cornelia, ‘Faith, Reason, God and Other Imponderables’, The New York Times 25 July 2006, https://tiny.pl/gsx76 (accessed Mar. 23, 2024).
Delfino Robert A., ‘Replacing Methodological Naturalism’, Metanexus 24th May 2007, pp. 1-14, https://tiny.pl/thmmz (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Dembski William A., ‘The Act of Creation: Bridging Transcendence and Immanence’, in Zarandi (ed.), Science and the Myth…, pp. 269-302.
Dembski William A., ‘Intelligent Design: A Brief Introduction’, 4Truth.NetScience February 5, 2008, https://tiny.pl/tmkvf (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Dembski William A., ‘Reinstating Design within Science’, in Campbell and Meyer, Darwinism, Design and Public…, pp. 403-417.
Derham William, Physico-theology or A Demonstration of The Being and Attributes of God from His Works of Creation, W. Innys and J. Richardson, London 1754, https://tiny.pl/tmrg4 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Devitt Michael, ‘Incommensurability and the Priority of Metaphysics’, in Hoyningen-Huene, Sankey (eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters…, pp. 143-157.
Dilley Stephen, ‘Philosophical Naturalism and Methodological Naturalism Strange Bedfellows?’, Philosophia Christi, vol. 12, no. 1, 2011, pp. 118-141, https://tiny.pl/tm9lr (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Dilley Stephen, ‘The Evolution of Methodological Naturalism in the Origin of Species’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, no. 1, 2013, pp. 20-58, https://tiny.pl/tr3v9 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Duhem Pierre, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Atheneum, New York 1962, https://tiny.pl/ww5xc (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Dyk Wiesław (ed.), Sozologia systemowa. Tom IV. Biosfera. Człowiek i jego środowisko w aspekcie przyrodniczym, filozoficznym i teologicznym, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin 2012.
Engels Frederick, Dialectics of Nature, transl. and ed. by Clemens Dutt, New York, International Publishers, 1940, https://tiny.pl/wwdk3 (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Feigl Herbert, Maxwell Grover (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space and Time, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. III, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1962.
Feyerabend PAUL K., Against Method. Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, New Left Books, London 1975.
Feyerabend Paul K., Against Method. Third Edition, Verso, London 1993.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Consolations for the Specialist’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2…, pp. 131-167.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘First Dialogue’, in Feyerabend, Three Dialogues…, pp. 1-48.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘How to Be a Good Empiricist. A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 3…, pp. 78-103.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Introduction to the Volumes 1 and 2’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1…, pp. ix-xiv.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘On the Improvement of the Sciences and the Arts and the Possible Identity of the Two’, in Cohen and Wartofsky (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium…, pp. 387-415.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘On the Limited Validity of Methodological Rules’, transl. by Eric Oberheim i Daniel Sirtes, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 3…, pp. 138-180.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Outline of a Pluralistic Theory of Knowledge and Action’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 3…, pp. 104-111.
Feyerabend Paul K., Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1. Realism, Rationalism & Scientific Method, 3 vols., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York – Port Chester – Melbourne – Sydney 1981.
Feyerabend Paul K., Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. Problems of Empiricism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York – Port Chester – Melbourne – Sydney 1981.
Feyerabend Paul K., Philosophical Papers. Vol. 3. Knowledge, Science and Relativism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York – Port Chester – Melbourne – Sydney 1999.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Problems of Empiricism’, in Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty…, pp. 145-260.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Reply to Criticism. Comments on Smart, Sellars and Putnam’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1…, pp. 104-131.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘Science, Freedom, and the Good Life’, The Philosophical Forum, vol. 1, no. 2, 1968, pp. 127-135.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2…, pp. 202-230.
Feyerabend Paul K., ‘The Problem of the Existence of Theoretical Entities’, in Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 3…, pp. 16-49.
Feyerabend Paul K., Three Dialogues on Knowledge, Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford UK & Cambridge USA 1991.
Forrest Barbara Carroll, ‘Inside Creationism’s Trojan Horse: A Closer Look at Intelligent Design’, Georgia Journal of Science, vol. 63, no. 3, 2005, pp. 153-166.
Førland Tor Egil, Values, Objectivity, and Explanation in Historiography, Routledge, New York 2017.
Fowler Thomas, ‘Naturalism and Science’, Metanexus 2011, September 1, pp. 1-17, https://tiny.pl/tmg8x (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Gordon Bruce L. and Dembski William A., ‘Introduction. The Nature of Nature Confronted’, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. xix-xxiv.
Gordon Bruce L. and Dembski William A. (eds.), The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science, ISI Books, Wilmington, Delaware 2011.
Gordon Bruce L., ‘The Rise of Naturalism and Its Problematic Role in Science and Culture’, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. 3-44.
Gregory Brad S., ‘No Room for God?: History, Science, Metaphysics, and the Study of Religion’, History and Theory, vol. 47, no. 4, 2008, pp. 495-519, https://tiny.pl/w4zxv (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Grimes John, ‘On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes across Saccades’, in Akins (ed.), Perception…, pp. 89-110.
Grizzle Raymond E., ‘Some Comments on the «Godless» Nature of Darwinian Evolution, and a Plea to the Philosophers among Us’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, vol. 43, 1992, pp. 175-177, https://tiny.pl/gzj7d (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Hall A. Rupert, The Scientific Revolution 1500–1800: The Formation of the Modern Scientific Attitude, Longmans, Green and Co., London – New York – Toronto 1954.
Harris William S., and Calvert John H., ‘Intelligent Design. The Scientific Alternative to Evolution’, The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, vol. 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 531-561, https://tiny.pl/wngpt (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Heller Michał, ‘Chrześcijański naturalizm’, Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 51, no. 3, 2003, pp. 41-58, https://tiny.pl/tq2q2 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Heller Michael (Michał), The New Physics and a New Theology, transl. by G.V. Coyne, S.J.S. Giovanninni, T.M. Sierotowicz, Vatican Observatory Publications, Vatican 1996.
Holloway Eric, ‘Problems with Non-Naturalistic Theories of Science’, in Bartlett and Holloway (eds.), Naturalism and Its Alternatives…, pp. 163-176.
Hooker Clifford A., ‘Systematic Realism’, Synthese, vol. 26, nos. 3-4, 1974, pp. 409-497.
Hovis R. Corby and Kragh Helge, ‘P.A.M. Dirac and the Beauty of Physics’, Scientific American, vol. 268, no. 5, May 1993, pp. 104-109.
Hoyle Fred and Wickramasinghe Nalin Chandra, Evolution from Space: A Theory of Cosmic Creationism, Simon & Schuster Inc., New York 1984.
Hoyningen-Huene Paul, Sankey Howard (eds.), Incommensurability and Related Matters, Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dordrecht 2001.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Antynaturalizm teorii inteligentnego projektu’, Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 54, no. 2, 2006, pp. 63-76, https://tiny.pl/tdzjz (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Curriculum Vitae’, https://tiny.pl/wwd24 (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Darwinowska teoria ewolucji jako teoria filozoficzna’, in Stefan Konstańczak, Tomasz Turowski (eds.), Filozofia jako mądrość bycia, Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2009, pp. 17-23, https://tiny.pl/q3m56 (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Dlaczego kreacjonizm jest pseudonauką?’, in Zon (ed.), Pogranicza nauki…, pp. 317-323, https://tiny.pl/q3m5b (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Epistemiczne układy odniesienia i «warunek Jodkowskiego»’, in Latawiec and Bugajak (eds.), Filozoficzne i naukowo-przyrodnicze elementy obrazu świata…, pp. 108-123, https://tiny.pl/q3m5s (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Eskapizm teologii i filozofii katolickiej w sprawie «nauka a religia»’, Na Początku…, nos. 7-8 (196-197), 2005, pp. 261-284, https://tiny.pl/gztl8 (accessed Mar. 23, 2023).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Filozofia przyrody a nauki przyrodnicze, Colloquia Communia, nos. 1-2 (82-83), 2007, pp. 15-22, https://tiny.pl/tlkgz (accessed Apr. 22, 2023).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Kreacjoniści przed sądem. Aspekty filozoficzne «małpich procesów»’, in Michalczenia, Mizińska, Ossowska (eds.), Poszukiwania filozoficzne. Tom I…, pp. 175-198, https://tiny.pl/xhz82 (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Konflikt nauka-religia a teoria inteligentnego projektu’, in Jodkowski (ed.), Teoria inteligentnego projektu…, pp. 145-180, https://tiny.pl/qzq8f (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Metafizyczne opowieści nauki jako fundament pluralizmu naukowego’, in Johnson, Wielka metafizyczna opowieść nauki…, pp. 74-85, https://tiny.pl/q3m5p (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, Metodologiczne aspekty kontrowersji ewolucjonizm-kreacjonizm, Realizm. Racjonalność. Relatywizm, vol. 35, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej, Lublin 1998.
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Nienaukowy fundament nauki’, in Pietrzak (ed.), Granice nauki…, pp. 59-108, https://tiny.pl/q3m1q (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz, ‘Racjonalność Kopernika i Darwina. Polemika z drem Eugeniuszem Moczydłowskim’, Na Początku…, no. 11-12A (174-175), 2003, pp. 433-448, https://tiny.pl/trs79 (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Jodkowski Kazimierz (ed.), Teoria inteligentnego projektu – nowe rozumienie naukowości?, Biblioteka Filozoficznych Aspektów Genezy, vol. 2, Wydawnictwo MEGAS, Warsaw 2007.
Johnson Phillip E., ‘Evolution as Dogma: The Establishment of Naturalism’, First Things October 1990, https://tiny.pl/thtm9 (accessed Apr. 22, 2023).
Johnson Phillip E., ‘What Is Darwinism?’, in Bauman (ed.), Man and Creation…, pp. 177-190.
Johnson Phillip E., Wielka metafizyczna opowieść nauki (z posłowiem Kazimierza Jodkowskiego), Archiwum Na Początku..., vol. 13, Polskie Towarzystwo Kreacjonistyczne, Warsaw 2003.
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Arguments for Methodological Naturalism and Their Roots in a Particular Metaphysics’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 19, no. 1, 2023, pp. 113-157, https://tiny.pl/c32z4 (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Argumenty przeciwko naturalizmowi jako epistemicznemu układowi odniesienia’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, Vol. 15, 2018, pp. 71-137, https://tiny.pl/w4r73 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Czym są epistemiczne układy odniesienia?’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, vol. 14, 2017, pp. 191-235, https://tiny.pl/g86dn (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., ‘Geneza idei epistemicznych układów odniesienia i ich odmiany’, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, vol. 14, 2017, pp. 137-190, https://tiny.pl/wwd2w (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., “Światopoglądowy i ideologiczny wymiar epistemicznych układów odniesienia a teistyczno-naturalistyczny epistemiczny układ odniesienia”, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, Vol. 15, 2018, pp. 139-222, https://tiny.pl/w4chg (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Kilian Krzysztof J., Współczesne epistemiczne układy odniesienia w nauce, Biblioteka Filozoficznych Aspektów Genezy, vol. 9, Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2021, https://tiny.pl/99l82 (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Kitcher Phillip, ‘Born-again Creationism’, in Pennock (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism…, pp. 257-288.
Kojonen Erkki Vesa Rope, Intelligent Design: A Theological and Philosophical Analysis, University of Helsinki Press, Helsinki 2014, https://tiny.pl/tmc7b (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Kojonen Erkki Vesa Rope, ‘Methodological Naturalism and the Truth-Seeking Objection’, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, vol. 81, 2017, pp. 335-355.
Konstańczak Stefan, Turowski Tomasz (eds.), Filozofia jako mądrość bycia, Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego, Zielona Góra 2009.
Koperski Jeffrey, The Physics of Theism: God, Physics, and the Philosophy of Science, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK 2015.
Krausz Michael (ed.), Is There a Single Right Interpretation?, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 2002.
Kuhn Thomas S., ‘The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research’, in Crombie (ed.), Scientific Change…, pp. 347-369.
Kuhn Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1970.
Lakatos Imre and Musgrave Alan (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1970.
Lakatos Imre, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in Lakatos, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1…, pp. 8-101.
Lakatos Imre, Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge – New York – Port Chester – Melbourne – Sydney 1978.
Laplane Lucie, Mantovani Paolo, Adolphs Ralph, Chang Hasok, Mantovani Alberto, McFall-Ngai Margaret, Rovelli Carlo, Sober Elliott and Pradeu Thomas, ‘Why Science needs Philosophy’, PNAS, vol. 11, no. 10, March 5, 2019, pp. 3948-3952, https://tiny.pl/wwd2t (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Larmer Robert A., ‘Is Methodological Naturalism Question-Begging?’, Philosophia Christi, vol. 5, no. 1, 2003, pp. 113-130, https://tiny.pl/g2sgc (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Larson Ronald G., ‘Revisiting the God of the Gaps’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, vol. 61, no. 1, 2009, pp. 13-22, https://tiny.pl/ww5gr (accessed Mar. 23, 2024).
Latawiec Anna, Bugajak Grzegorz (eds.), Filozoficzne i naukowo-przyrodnicze elementy obrazu świata 7, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, Warsaw 2008.
Lenin Vladimir Ilyich, Materialism and Empirio-criticism: Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1987.
Lewens Tim, ‘Realism and the Strong Program’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 56, 2005, pp. 559-577.
Mach Ernst, Die Principien der Wärmelehre. Historisch-kritisch entwickelt, Johan Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig 1900.
Malec Grzegorz, ‘Teologiczne dylematy Karola Darwina’, Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 60, no. 1, 2012, pp. 67-85, http://tiny.pl/g4751 (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
McMullin Ernan, ‘Varieties of Methodological Naturalism’, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. 82-92.
Mehlberg Henryk, ‘O niesprawdzalnych założeniach nauki’, Przegląd Filozoficzny, vol. 44, iss. 4, 1948, pp. 319–335.
Meyer Stephen C., ‘DNA and the Origin of Life: Information, Specification, and Explanation’, in: Campbell and Meyer (eds.), Darwinism, Design and Public…, pp. 223-285.
Meyer Stephen C., ‘Scientific Tenets of Faith’, Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, vol. 38, no. 1, 1986, pp. 40-42, https://tiny.pl/wwfqv (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Meyer Stephen C., Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, Harper One, New York 2009.
Meyer Stephen C., ‘The Use and Abuse of Philosophy of Science: A Response to Moreland’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1994, pp. 14-18, https://tiny.pl/w28q5 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Michalczenia Jakub, Mizińska Jadwiga, Ossowska Katarzyna (eds.), Poszukiwania filozoficzne. Tom I: Nauka, Prawda. Panu Profesorowi Józefowi Dębowskiemu w darze, Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie, Olsztyn 2014.
Miller Keith B., ‘Countering Public Misconceptions about the Nature of Evolutionary Science’, Georgia Journal of Science, vol. 63, no. 3, 2005, pp. 175-189, https://tiny.pl/tqw12 (accessed Mar. 20, 2024).
Miller Keith B., ‘The Misguided Attack on Methodological Naturalism’, in Schneiderman and Allmon (eds.), For the Rock Record…, pp. 117-140.
Mohanty Jitendranath, ‘Intentionality, Meaning, and Open-Endedness of Interpretation’, in Krausz (ed.), Is There a Single Right Interpretation…, pp. 63-75.
Moreland James Porter, Scientism and Secularism: Learning to Respond to a Dangerous Ideology, Crossway, Wheaton Ill. 2018.
Moreland James Porter (ed.), The Creation Hypothesis: Scientific Evidence for an Intelligent Designer InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove 1994.
Morris Henry M., Scientific Creationism, Creation-Life Publishers, San Diego 1974.
Munévar Gonzalo, A Theory of Wonder: Evolution, Brain and the Radical Nature of Science, Vernon Press, Wilmington, Malaga 2021.
Nagel Thomas, ‘Public Education and Intelligent Design’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 36, no. 2, 2008, pp. 187-205.
Neurath Otto, ‘Soziologie im Physikalismus’, Erkenntnis, vol. 2, 1931, pp. 393-431.
Newton Isaac, The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, transl. by Andrew Motte, Daniel Adee, New York 1846, https://tiny.pl/ww5nf (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Newton-Smith William H., ‘The Underdetermination of Theory by Data’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, vol. 52, 1978, pp. 71-91.
O’Connor Robert C., ‘Science on Trial: Exploring the Rationality of Methodological Naturalism’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, vol. 49, no. 1, 1997, pp. 15-31, https://tiny.pl/wwf95 (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Oldroyd David R., Darwinian Impacts: An Introduction to the Darwinian Revolution, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey 1980.
Pennock Robert T. (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2001.
Pennock Robert, ‘Naturalism, Evidence, and Creationism: The Case of Phillip Johnson’, in Pennock (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism…, pp. 77-97.
Pennock Robert T., Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism, MIT Press, Cambridge 1999.
Pietrzak Zbigniew (ed.), Granice nauki, Lectiones & Acroases Philosophicae, vol. VI, no. 1, 2013.
Pine Ronald H., ‘But Some of Them Are Scientists, Aren’t They?’, Creation/Evolution Journal, vol. 4, no. 4, 1984, pp. 6-18, https://tiny.pl/g2vxk (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Plantinga Alvin, ‘Methodological Naturalism?’, in Van Der Meer (ed.), Facets of Faith and Science…, pp. 177-221.
Poe Harry Lee and Mytyk Chelsea Rose, ‘From Scientific Method to Methodological Naturalism: The Evolution of an Idea’, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, vol. 59, no. 3, September 2007, pp. 213-218, https://tiny.pl/ww5qq (accessed Mar. 23, 2024).
Poincaré Henri, The Value of Science, Dover Publications Inc., New York 1958.
Polanyi Michael, ‘Life Transcending Physics and Chemistry’, Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 45, iss. 21, 1967, pp. 54-66.
Polanyi Michael, ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory’, Minerva, vol. 38, 2000, pp. 1-32.
Popper Karl R., ‘A Metaphysical Epilogue’ in Popper, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics…, pp. 159-211.
Popper Karl R., Logik der Forschung. Zur Erkenntnistheorie der Modernen Naturwissenschaft, Springer-Verlag, Wien GmbH 1935.
Popper Karl R., ‘Replies to My Critics’, in Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper…, pp. 961-1197.
Popper Karl R., Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics. From the Postscript to The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Roman and Littlefield, Totowa 1982.
Popper Karl R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge Classics, London and New York 2002.
Ratzsch Del, ‘Natural Theology, Methodological Naturalism, and «Turtles All the Way Down»’, Faith and Philosophy, vol. 21, no. 4, 2004, pp. 436-455.
Ratzsch Del, Nature, Design and Science. The Status of Design in Natural Science, State University of New York Press, Albany 2001.
RENNIE John, “15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense”, Scientific American July 1st, 2002, https://tiny.pl/ww5x4 (accessed Apr. 22, 2023).
Reynolds John Mark, ‘Intelligent Design and the Contemporary Christian’, The Southern Baptist Journal of Theology, vol. 11, no. 1, 2007, pp. 64-77, https://tiny.pl/tmdc3 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Robinson James T., ‘Incommensurability of Evolution and Special Creation’, The American Biology Teacher, vol. 33, no. 9, 1971, pp. 535-545.
Ruse Michael, ‘Darwinism: Philosophical Preference, Scientific Inference, and Good Research Strategy’, in Buell and Hearn (eds.), Darwinism: Science or Philosophy…, pp. 21-28.
Ruse Michael and Dembski William A. (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.
Sagan Dariusz, ‘Naturalizm metodologiczny – konieczny warunek naukowości?’, Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 51, no. 1, 2013, pp. 73-91, https://tiny.pl/q33sb (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Seckbach Joseph, Gordon Richard (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection. Science, Faith and Evolution, World Scientific, New Jersey, London, Singapore, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Tai Pei, Chennai, 2009.
Schilpp Paul A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, The Library of Living Philosophers, vol. 14, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois 1974.
Schneiderman Jill S. and Allmon Warren D. (eds.), For the Rock Record: Geologists on Intelligent Design, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London 2009.
Scott Eugenie C., Evolution vs. Creationism. An Introduction. Second Edition, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, London 2009.
Seckbach Joseph and Chela-Flores Julian, ‘Preface 1. Where Did We Come From?’, in Seckbach, Gordon (eds.), Divine Action and Natural Selection…, pp. xxxv-xxxvii.
Secord James A. (dir.), Darwin Correspondence Project, Cambridge University Library and the Department for the History and Philosophy of Science, https://tiny.pl/tmfqw (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Shanks Niall, God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory, Oxford University Press, New York 2004.
Stilwell Phil, “The Status of Methodological Naturalism as Justified by Precedent”, Studies in Liberal Arts and Sciences 2009, No. 41, pp. 229-247.
Szanton Andrew, The Recollections of Eugene P. Wigner, Plenum Press, New York 1992.
Thaxton Charles, ‘A New Design Argument’, Discovery.org, https://tiny.pl/wwf9d (accessed Mar. 21, 2024).
Van Der Meer Jitse M. (ed.), Facets of Faith and Science: Volume 1: Historiography and Modes of Interaction, The Pascal Centre for Advanced Studies in Faith and Science & University Press of America Inc., Lanham – New York – London 1996.
Van Till Howard J., ‘Cosmic Evolution, Naturalism, and Divine Creativity, or Who Owns the Robust Formational Economy Principle?’, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. 535-546.
Vries De Paul, ‘Naturalism in the Natural Sciences: A Christian Perspective’, Christian Scholar’s Review, vol. 15, no. 4, Summer 1986, pp. 388-396.
Watkins John W.N., ‘Against «Normal Science»’, in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth…, pp. 25-38.
Whewell William, Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology, Bridgewater Treatises. Treatise III, William Pickering, London 1833, https://tiny.pl/ww5s9 (accessed Mar. 22, 2024).
Wigner Eugene, ‘The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences’, Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 13, 1960, pp. 1-14.
Willard Dallas, ‘Naturalism’s Incapacity to Capture the Good Will’, in Gordon and Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature…, pp. 865-879.
Wilson Edward O., On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., London 1978.
Witt Jonathan, ‘A Brief History of the Scientific Theory of Intelligent Design’, Discovery Institute October 30, 2007, https://tiny.pl/w2sj4 (accessed Mar. 23, 2024).
Wright Robert, Three Scientists and Their Gods: Looking for Meaning in an Age of Information, Times Books, New York 1988.
Zarandi Mehrdad M. (ed.), Science and the Myth of Progress, The Library of Perennial Philosophy, World Wisdom Inc., Bloomington Ind. 2003.
Zon Józef (ed.), Pogranicza nauki. Protonauka – paranauka – pseudonauka, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2009.
Zybertowicz Andrzej et al., Samobójstwo Oświecenia?, Wydawnictwo Kasper, Krakow 2015.
Życiński Józef, Bóg i ewolucja. Podstawowe pytania ewolucjonizmu chrześcijańskiego, Prace Wydziału Filozoficznego, vol. 89, Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, Lublin 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Krzysztof Kilian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
