Guilt: Facing the Problem of Ethical Solipsism

Authors

  • Sami Pihlstrom Professor, Univ. of Jyvaskyla; Director, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies

Keywords:

ethics, morality, guilt, transcendental conditions, Kant, Wittgenstein, Levinas

Abstract

Abstract: This article deals with the constitutive role played by the emotion of guilt, or the capacity of experiencing such emotions, in our moral life. The deeply personal nature of moral guilt (or remorse) leads to the problem of ethical solipsism: it seems that guilt can in the end concern only me, not anyone else, in a morally profound sense. Echoing Dostoevsky, the truly ethical thinker ought to acknowledge that everyone is guilty in front of the entire mankind, "and I more than anyone else”. This problematic feature of our moral perspectives on the world is examined through comments on a number of authors, including Kant, Wittgenstein, Levinas, Gaita, and Todorov. While we do need to avoid solipsism, there is a "truth” hidden in it: morality is something that we are individually and personally deeply responsible for.

Author Biography

Sami Pihlstrom, Professor, Univ. of Jyvaskyla; Director, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies

Director (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, 2009-), Professor of Practical Philosophy (Univ. of Jyvaskyla), Docent of Theoretical Philosophy (Univ. of Helsinki).

Downloads

Published

07-12-2011

How to Cite

Pihlstrom, S. (2011). Guilt: Facing the Problem of Ethical Solipsism. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 7(2), 114–135. Retrieved from http://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/172