Flipping the Counterfeit Coin
Why AI Can’t Make Art
Keywords:
AI, the Person, Ethical phenomenology, the Principle of art, ImaginationAbstract
As Big-Tech gains more control over human appetites and aversions (which Hobbes notoriously reduced humanity to), it is crucial to understand technology’s limitations. Why it cannot do the most important thing, upon which the prudence to balance autonomy with necessity rests: distinguish believing from knowing. This is an ‘ethical’ deficiency, revealed in reasons proposed here why AI can’t possibly make art (replaced now mostly by cultural artefact-making, which AI will excel at). Because aesthetics is about knowing, not perceiving (as Kant believed), such reasoning matters to human survival. It has deteriorated in modern mythology under the mechanistic worldview that Descartes, Hobbes, Locke, and others of the failed enlightenment project advanced to control Nature. Now driven by an avaricious political and technocratic elite advancing posthuman (anti-humanist) ideology, ‘mechanism’ underwrites excesses leading humanity toward self-destruction via militarism, dehumanisation, and ecological devastation. To control it, contrasting nature's teleological "mechanism" with humanity's ‘telos’, I propose embracing an "ahistorical" humanist perspective rooted in the Principle of Art, ancient mythology, and Aristotelian and Schellingian inspired complexity science. This shows mechanism and teleology are two different species of ‘acts’; and having a “free relation” with both Nature and technology requires promoting humanity’s ahistorical ‘being’ via genuine art-making.
References
Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics: A New Translation. Translated with an Interpretive Essay, Notes and Glossary by Robert C Bartlett and Susan D Collins. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Bertinetto, Alessandro. Aesthetics of Improvisation. Leiden: Brill, 2022.
Bowie, Andrew. Aesthetics and Subjectivity: from Kant to Nietzsche. Manchester University Press, 2003.
Bruns, Gerald. Review of Art and Aesthetics After Adorno, Jay M. Bernstein, Claudia Brodsky, Anthony J. Cascardi, Thierry de Duve, Aleš Erjavec, Robert Kaufman, and Fred Rush. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/art-and-aesthetics-after-adorno/ 2011.03.11
Bull, Malcolm. "Why is there the amount of Art that there is?", New Left Review (2025): 151 Jan/Feb.
Dahlin, Bo, “Epistemology, Technology, and Spiritual Science.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 17 3 (2021): 68-103.
Edwards, Betty. Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain: How to unlock your hidden artistic talent. USA: Fontana Collins, 1984.
Emad, Parvis. “Person, Death, and World” in Max Scheler (1874-1928): Centennial Essays. Translated by Daniel Liderbach. Editors Max Scheler and Manfred S Frings. 58-84 The Hague: Niijhoff, 1974.
Kauffman, Stuart A and Arran E Gare. “Beyond Descartes and Newton: Recovering life and humanity.” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology XXX (2015): 1-26.
Gare, Arran E. “Against Posthumanism: Posthumanism as the World Vision of House-Slaves.” Borderless Philosophy 4 (2021): 1-56. https://philpapers.org/rec/GARAPP
———. “Mathematics, Narratives and Life: Reconciling Science and the Humanities”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 20 1 July (2024): 133-55.
———. “Overcoming the Fetishism of Money and Machines through Human Ecology: Building on the Work of Alf Hornborg”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 21 1 July (2025): 729-64.
———. “Process philosophy and the Emergent Theory of Mind: Whitehead, Lloyd Morgan and Schelling.” Concrescence: the Australasian Journal of Process Thought, 3 1 June (2002): 1-12.
———. Review of "The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Western World." Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 8 1 (2012): 412-449.
———. “The Arts and the Radical Enlightenment: Gaining Liberty to Save the Planet.” The Structurist, 47/48 (2007/2008): 20-27.
———. “The Centrality of Philosophical Anthropology to (A Future) Environmental Ethics.” Cuadernos de bioetica: revista oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica, 27 91 September (2016): 299-317.
Hammermeister, Kai. The German Aesthetic Tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Healy, Paul. “Living With Technology: Human Enhancement or Human Development?” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 16 2 (Oct. 2020): 357-68.
Howells, Christina, and Gerald Moore, eds. ‘Stiegler and Technics’: Critical Collections. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2013.
Kaushik, Rajiv. Art and Institution: Aesthetics in the Late Works of Merleau-Ponty. London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
Leroi, Armand Marie. The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science. London: Bloomsbury Paperbacks, 2015.
MacIntyre, Alisdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.
McGilchrist, Iain. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2010.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
Polak, Fred. The Image of the Future. Translated and abridged Elise Boulding. Amsterdam, London, New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1973.
Polanyi, Michael. The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1983.
Prawat, Richard S. “The Nominalism Versus Realism Debate: Towards a Philosophical Rather than a Political Resolution.” Educational Theory, 53 3 (Summer 2003): 275-311.
Ricoeur, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language. Routledge, 2003.
Sass, Louis. Madness and Modernism: Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature and Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Segall, Matthew D. “Poetic Imagination in the Speculative Philosophies of Plato, Schelling, and Whitehead.” Academia.edu. 5/10/2012:1-23.
Scheler, Max. Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. Translated by Manfred S. Frings and Richard L. Funk. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph. The Philosophy of Art. Volume 58 Theory and History of Literature, Edited, translated and introduced by Douglas W Stott. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
Segovia, Carlos A. “Fire in Three Images from Heraclitus to the Anthropocene.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 17 3, (2021). 501-521.
Steinbuch, Thomas and Haiyan Guo. “On Not Democratizing Art: Kant’s Cosmological Sublime Versus Nietzsche’s Party of Life and The Negative Aesthetics of Divergence: Querying Kaplama’s Super-Sensible Séance and Strong’s Magical Incantation of Transfiguration”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 21 1 (July 2025): 119–149.
Torsen, Ingvild. “Disinterest and Truth: On Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetics.” British Journal of Aesthetics, 56 1 (2016):15-32.
Trimarchi, Nat. “Harmonising Humanity with Nature: Metaphor, the Person, and Art’s Higher Meaning”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 21 1 (2025):11-118.
———. “Peirce’s Suspended Second, and Art’s ‘Ethical Phenomenology’”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 20 2 (2024): 318-401.
———. 2024. Re-worlding the World: Schelling’s Philosophy of Art. NIPEA. Retrieved from https://nipea.info/philosophia-naturalis/re-worlding-the-world-schellings-philosophy-of-art/
———. “Schelling’s ‘Art in the Particular’: Reorienting Final Cause”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 20 1 (2024): 416–499.
———. “The Aesthetics of Meaning”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 18 2 (2022): 251–304.
———. “The Poles of Idea and Reality (and the De-futurising of Art and Humanity)”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 19 1 (2023): 426–457.
———. “The Principle of Art (in Practice)”. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 21(2) (2025): 175–255.
———. 2025. The Way Out: Naturalising Art (for a New Mythology). Swinburne. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.25916/sut.28587830.v1
Végsö, Roland. Worldlessness after Heidegger: Phenomenology, Psychoanalysis, Deconstruction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020.
Voronsky, Aleksandr K. Art as the Cognition of Life: Selected Writings 1911-1936. Translated and edited by Frederick S Choate. Oak Park, Michigan: Mehring Books Inc. 1998
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nat Trimarchi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
